<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		
		<title>Aetna Latest Healthy Living News</title>
		<link>http://www.planforyourhealth.com/</link>
		<description>Latest Healthy Living News from Aetna</description>
		<language>en</language>
		
		<generator>TYPO3 - get.content.right</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		
		
		
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 13:47:00 -0500</lastBuildDate>
		
		
		<item>
			<title>Simple Injection May Stop Long Seizures</title>
			<link>http://www.planforyourhealth.com/living-healthy/health-news/healthy-living/healthy-living-details/newsarticle/simple-injection-may-stop-long-seizures/</link>
			<description>A pre-loaded injector may deliver drugs to halt long seizures more easily than the intravenous...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[A pre-loaded injector may deliver drugs to halt long seizures more easily than the intravenous drugs used now, researchers say. A study published February 16 compared two ways of treating severe seizures called status epilepticus. Some can be life-threatening. To stop the seizures, drugs usually are given through a vein in the arm. But it can be difficult to insert an intravenous (IV) line while someone is having a seizure. Researchers trained more than 4,000 paramedics to treat patients with both an IV drug and an auto-injector. The injector shot was given in a muscle, usually the thigh. Half of the time, the injector was filled with a fake drug and the IV drug was real. For the other cases, the injector drug was real and the IV drug was fake. In all, 893 patients were treated. Seizures stopped before people reached the hospital for 73% of those who got the real injector drug and 63% of those who got the IV drug. People who got the injector drug were less likely than the others to be admitted to the hospital after their seizure. The New England Journal of Medicine published the study. The New York Times News Service wrote about it.
<strong>What Is the Doctor's Reaction?</strong>
A generalized, or grand mal, seizure is a frightening event for all concerned. First, the person loses consciousness and collapses to the ground. Next comes a series of strong muscle contractions that produce twitching and shaking movements. Breathing becomes difficult and may even stop briefly. Jaw-clenching may produce a bitten tongue and bleeding from the mouth. The person may lose bowel or bladder control.
Fortunately, most seizures stop by themselves within 2 to 5 minutes. After a generalized seizure, most people will not be able to talk right away. They can remain confused for a few hours afterward. In rare instances, someone may get injured from falling during a seizure. Otherwise, seizures that end quickly are not dangerous. They do not cause brain damage.
A seizure that lasts for more than 5 to 10 minutes is a medical emergency. Doctors call this status epilepticus. Each year, an estimated 100,000 to 200,000 status epilepticus seizures occur in the United States.
Unlike seizures that stop sooner than 5 minutes, status epilepticus can cause permanent damage and disability. There is also a 15% to 22% risk of death.
The longer a seizure goes on past 10 minutes, the more likely it is that the seizure will not stop on its own. The drugs used to stop a seizure also become less effective as the seizure lasts longer. So the sooner an anti-seizure medicine can reach the brain, the better the outcome.
The fastest way to get medicine to the brain is by injecting through a vein into the bloodstream. However, it takes time to set up an IV, find a &quot;good&quot; vein and make a successful stick. This is especially challenging when someone is having a seizure. Researchers have been testing if other ways of delivering anti-seizure medicine could work as quickly as an IV and be easier to use.
This week's New England Journal of Medicine includes research on one such approach. The study was designed to see if injecting a benzodiazepine drug into a muscle would stop status epilepticus as well as giving the drug into a vein. Benzodiazepines are the drugs of choice for status epilepticus. These drugs include lorazepam (Ativan) and midazolam (Versed).
In the study, the injections were given by a preloaded syringe. The syringe automatically pushed the drug into the muscle after going through the skin.
The researchers were hoping that the muscle injection would work as well as the IV injection. It actually worked faster and better. The muscle injection stopped the seizure in 73.4% of the patients. The IV route stopped the seizure in 63.4%.
<strong>What Changes Can I Make Now?</strong>
Here's what to do if you witness a seizure. Stay calm and do your best to keep everyone else calm. If no one knows the person, call 911 or have someone else do it.
Time the seizure. If the person is known to have a seizure disorder (epilepsy), call 911 anyway if the seizure does not stop within 2 to 3 minutes. Try to remember as many details as you can to tell the paramedics and doctor later.
Don't try to hold the person down or force anything into his or her mouth, even if the tongue is bleeding. To prevent head injury, gently place a soft, flat object under the head. For example, use a folded jacket. Loosen the collar or tie, but only if you can do so gently. Remove any nearby hard or sharp objects.
When the jerking stops, gently roll the person onto his or her side. When he or she wakes up, be reassuring and provide a ride or other help that may be needed.
<strong>What Can I Expect Looking to the Future?</strong>
Once these auto-injectors become more widely available, they will become part of standard equipment in ambulances. Further in the future, people with a history of status epilepticus will likely be provided with a home treatment. Besides auto-injectors to deliver the anti-seizure medicine into a muscle, researchers are also testing a nasal spray.]]></content:encoded>
			
			<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 12:24:00 -0500</pubDate>
			
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Study: Antibiotics Don't Help Most Sinusitis</title>
			<link>http://www.planforyourhealth.com/living-healthy/health-news/healthy-living/healthy-living-details/newsarticle/study-antibiotics-dont-help-most-sinusitis/</link>
			<description> Antibiotics don't help people feel better faster with a short-term  sinus infection, a new study...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Antibiotics don't help people feel better faster with a short-term  sinus infection, a new study finds. The study included 166 adults with  acute sinusitis. Everyone's symptoms had lasted less than 4 weeks.  Everyone got treatment for symptoms. But people also took pills labeled  amoxicillin, an antibiotic. Half of the people got the real thing. The  others got placebo (fake) pills. People were interviewed by phone  several times to ask about symptoms. Those in both groups reported about  the same level of symptoms after 3 days and 10 days. After 10 days,  about 8 out of 10 people said their symptoms were much better or gone.  Researchers also called back on day 28. People who got the fake pills  were also no more likely than the antibiotic group to report a return of  symptoms. The Journal of the American Medical Association published the  study. HealthDay News wrote about it February 14. 
<strong>What Is the Doctor's Reaction?</strong>
  If you've ever had sinus trouble, you may have wondered how you could  get relief quickly. The congestion, pressure and pain can make life  truly miserable. And it can go on for weeks. 
 Do antibiotics help to cure sinusitis? In many (perhaps even most) cases, the answer is no. 
  But treating sinusitis with antibiotics seems so logical. A bacterial  infection often causes the symptoms. And antibiotics kill bacteria. So  why aren't these drugs clearly helpful? 
 The reason is that  sinusitis usually gets better just as quickly without antibiotics as  with them. Viral infections, allergies and poor sinus drainage may  trigger sinus symptoms. These conditions will <em>not</em> improve any  faster with antibiotics than without them. Even when bacteria cause the  symptoms, it's not clear that antibiotics are needed. These infections  often get better quickly without these drugs. 
 A new study  provides some of the best evidence to date on the role of antibiotics in  the treatment of sinusitis. The full name for this condition is acute  rhinosinusitis. It means sudden inflammation of the sinuses and nasal  passages. 
 The new study included 166 people with sinus  inflammation. Doctors thought that the cause was a bacterial infection.  All received treatment for symptoms. For example, they took  decongestants for a stuffy head or acetaminophen for pain. 
 Half  also received a 10-day course of amoxicillin. This is an antibiotic  that's commonly prescribed for sinus infections. The other half took a  placebo for 10 days. 
 During and after treatment, each person was asked in detail about symptoms. Both groups had similar answers related to: 
<ul><li>Improvement in sinus symptoms after 3 days and after 10 days of treatment</li><li>Whether they had to miss work</li><li>How well they could perform their usual activities</li><li>Relapse (return of symptoms) and recurrence (development of a new infection) </li><li>Overall satisfaction with treatment</li></ul>
 These findings are important because sinusitis: 
<ul><li>Is common</li><li>Is a frequent cause of missed work</li><li>Accounts for major health care costs</li><li>Is commonly treated with antibiotics </li></ul>
  Doctors are trying more to avoid treating people with antibiotics that  they don't need. Excess use of these drugs gives bacteria more chances  to become resistant to them. Then the drugs don't work when they are  needed. Antibiotics also can sometimes cause serious side effects. For  example, some people are allergic. Some antibiotics can have dangerous  interactions with other drugs. 
 Do the results of this study mean that people should <em>never</em>  take antibiotics for sinus symptoms? Not at all. This study did not  include chronic sinusitis. This is sinus inflammation that lasts for  weeks. It also did not include sinus infections that lead to further  problems, such as an infection that spreads outside the sinuses.  Antibiotics may be particularly helpful and important for these  situations. 
 <strong>What Changes Can I Make Now?</strong>
 There is no magic to weight loss. Eat less. Exercise more. 
  One of the main reasons that doctors prescribe antibiotics for  sinusitis is that their patients expect it. Sometimes patients even <em>demand</em>  antibiotics. This needs to change. Patients and their doctors should  consider studies, like this one, that show antibiotic treatment is often  not needed. 
 If you have sinus symptoms, several treatments can help you feel better without antibiotics. They include: 
<ul><li>Decongestants, such as pseudoephedrine (Sudafed) or oxymetazoline (Afrin, Mucinex and others) </li><li>Antihistamines,  including diphenhydramine (Benadryl), chlorpheniramine  (Chlor-Trimeton), loratadine (Claritin), fexofenadine (Allegra) and  cetirizine (Zyrtec) </li><li>Nasal sprays that contain salt water (saline) or steroids, including mometasone (Nasonex) and fluticasone (Flonase) </li><li>Pain relievers, such as acetaminophen (Tylenol) or ibuprofen (Advil and others) </li></ul>
  If you want to use an antihistamine, check with your doctor first.  These medicines may reduce allergic symptoms, such as an itchy nose. But  they may also dry out the nasal passages, which can hinder drainage. 
  Contact your doctor if your symptoms won't go away or get worse. Also  call if you develop a fever. Your illness may be worse than what the  people in this latest study had. And that means antibiotics (and other  treatments) may be warranted. 
 <strong>What Can I Expect Looking to the Future?</strong>
  This new study may discourage doctors from prescribing antibiotics for  acute sinusitis in the future. But doctors will need to explain why,  including the results of this new study. Over time, patients should  become less likely to expect antibiotics for sinusitis. 
 In an  age of increasing bacterial resistance, we need to use antibiotics only  when needed. Look for more research that better defines when antibiotics  are and are not helpful for people with sinus trouble. ]]></content:encoded>
			
			<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 13:47:00 -0500</pubDate>
			
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Experts: Cheap Seats Don't Raise Clot Risk</title>
			<link>http://www.planforyourhealth.com/living-healthy/health-news/healthy-living/healthy-living-details/newsarticle/experts-cheap-seats-dont-raise-clot-risk/</link>
			<description> Sitting in coach class doesn't increase your risk of a blood clot  after a long flight, an expert...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Sitting in coach class doesn't increase your risk of a blood clot  after a long flight, an expert group says. Some people have called these  clots &quot;economy class syndrome.&quot; But people in first class have about  the same risk, new guidelines say. The guidelines come from the American  College of Chest Physicians. They include advice on preventing deep  vein thrombosis. This type of clot occurs in the leg. It is more common  after a long flight or another long period without movement. The  guidelines also cover prevention of clots in the lungs and in arteries.  The risk of deep vein thrombosis is very low, the guidelines say. The  average risk is 1 out of 1,000 people each year. That risk doubles on  flights of at least 8 hours. But you can help prevent these clots if you  get up and move around on the flight. Some people have a greater risk.  They include people who have had recent surgery or take birth control  pills. People with a high risk should wear compression stockings during  long flights, the guidelines say. The journal Chest published the  guidelines. The Associated Press wrote about them February 7. 
<strong>What Is the Doctor's Reaction?</strong>
 The professionals who put together these detailed guidelines deserve a huge &quot;thank you&quot; from all of us. 
  Doctors face difficult questions every day about how best to prevent  and treat blood clots in their patients. The journal Chest has just  published new guidelines to help them. 
 The authors of the  guidelines challenged themselves to be as brief as possible. Despite  this great effort, the guidelines are still 40 pages long. They provide  condensed suggestions for the hundreds of different situations that  require blood clot prevention and treatment decisions. 
 These guidelines address blood clots in: 
<ul><li>Large veins, called deep vein thrombosis (DVT) </li><li>Lungs, called pulmonary emboli</li><li>The heart</li><li>The coronary arteries on the outside of the heart, where blockages cause chest pain (angina) and heart attacks</li><li>Arteries to the brain and inside the brain, where blockages cause strokes</li></ul>
  The Associated Press (AP) article concentrates on just one aspect of  the guidelines. AP focuses on the risk of a DVT when you sit for a long  time, such as a long plane ride. 
 Before the recent publicity  about &quot;economy class syndrome,&quot; most people sailed through life without  ever worrying about getting a DVT. In fact, whether you sit in first  class or the more cramped economy class, you have the same risk of one  of these deep vein clots. 
 Unless you have an above-average risk,  the chance of a DVT is extremely low. This is especially true if you  have no risk factors and your flight is under four hours. 
 Factors that increase the risk of developing a DVT include: 
<ul><li>Injury to a vein from a broken bone or severe trauma</li><li>Recent major surgery, especially on the abdomen, pelvis, hip or leg</li><li>Slow blood flow caused by a long bed rest or being unable to move much because of a cast</li><li>Use of hormones such as testosterone or estrogen (including birth control pills or hormone therapy after menopause) </li><li>Pregnancy</li><li>Severe obesity</li><li>Some medical conditions, such as: <br /><ul><li>An inherited clotting disorder</li><li>A strong family history of DVT</li><li>Active cancer</li><li>Inflammatory bowel disease (ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease) </li><li>Lupus</li></ul></li></ul>
 <strong>What Changes Can I Make Now?</strong>
  If you have any of these risk factors, or if you have had a DVT before,  your risk of a future DVT is higher than average. The experts suggest  that you take these prevention measures on long plane rides: 
<ol><li>Get up and move around often. Stand up and stretch your arms and legs at least once an hour. Walk up and down the aisle. </li><li>Book an aisle seat when possible. You are more likely to get out of your seat if you're not disturbing anyone. </li><li>Move  your leg and foot muscles while sitting. Do simple exercises such as  straightening your knee and stretching your leg. Point your toes up,  then down. Give yourself more room to move by storing as little as  possible under the seat in front of you. </li><li>Wear properly fitted below-the-knee compression stockings. </li></ol>
  This advice makes sense whenever you need to sit for several hours at a  time -- in the car, on a train, at work or even at home. 
 Long  distance travelers without any risk factors can also benefit from the  first three prevention measures. But the experts say compression  stockings are not needed. 
 Two more tips for everyone to help prevent a DVT during long flights: 
<ul><li>Drink  plenty of liquids. Bring extra bottles of water on board. Drink enough  water to make you get up and use the restroom several times. </li><li>Avoid alcohol. Alcohol can dry you out. It can also make you so drowsy that you don't move much. </li></ul>
 <strong>What Can I Expect Looking to the Future?</strong>
  The guidelines contain many more excellent recommendations. They will  help doctors and their patients decide on what clot treatment or  prevention to choose. 
 But these guidelines, like all guidelines,  rely in many cases on the doctor determining if the benefit is worth  the risk. This is often a very close call. So the choice of therapy to  prevent or treat blood clots will often remain challenging. ]]></content:encoded>
			
			<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 09:07:00 -0500</pubDate>
			
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Pill May Help Control Fibroids in Uterus</title>
			<link>http://www.planforyourhealth.com/living-healthy/health-news/healthy-living/healthy-living-details/newsarticle/pill-may-help-control-fibroids-in-uterus/</link>
			<description> A smaller dose of the &quot;morning after&quot; birth  control pill may help to control fibroids...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="body"> A smaller dose of the &quot;morning after&quot; birth  control pill may help to control fibroids in the uterus as well. That's  the conclusion of two new studies. They were done in Europe, where the  pill is awaiting approval. Fibroids are growths that can cause heavy  bleeding, pain and fertility problems. Fibroids are not cancerous, but  treatments often don't work well. Esmya is a lower dose of the drugs in  Ella, an emergency birth control pill. The new studies included a total  of 550 women with fibroids. All had such severe symptoms that they were  planning surgery. In one study, women were randomly assigned to take  Esmya or placebo (fake) pills for 3 months. The other study compared  Esmya with a monthly hormone-blocking shot. It controls fibroids, but  can thin bones after long use. Women received either Esmya and a fake  shot, or a real shot and a fake pill. Esmya stopped bleeding and shrank  fibroids in most women. The second study showed it worked as well as the  shot, but with fewer side effects. The New England Journal of Medicine  published the studies. The Associated Press wrote about them February 2.  
<br />
<strong>What Is the Doctor's Reaction?</strong>
  When a medical condition has several treatment options, with none being  the best, it's welcome news to hear about a treatment with fewer side  effects. That may be the case for a drug called ulipristal acetate. It's  a new treatment for fibroid symptoms. 
 Fibroids in the uterus  are very common. They occur in up to 75% of women. They are rubbery  growths in the wall of the uterus. Fibroids are not cancerous. 
  The hormones estrogen and progesterone stimulate the growth of fibroids.  Therefore, they tend to enlarge during a woman's child-bearing years,  when the ovaries are still producing female hormones. When hormone  levels fall after menopause, fibroids shrink. 
 Most women have no  symptoms from fibroids. They might never know that they had them if  they are small. Or a doctor could feel them during a pelvic exam or see  them on an ultrasound done for some other reason. 
 About 25% of  women have symptoms. The most common symptoms are discomfort in the  pelvic area and irregular or heavy menstrual bleeding. The pain  sometimes can be quite severe. And the heavy periods can lead to  iron-deficiency anemia (a low red blood cell count). 
 Large  fibroids can push on the bladder, causing a frequent urge to urinate.  During pregnancy, very high levels of estrogen and progesterone can  stimulate quicker growth of fibroids. This is linked with a greater than  average risk of miscarriage. 
 African-American women are three  times more likely to develop symptom-causing fibroids than women of  other ethnic groups. Also, they typically do so at an earlier age. 
  No one knows exactly why fibroids form. Genes that speed up the growth  of muscle cells in the uterus may play a role. Abnormal blood vessels in  the uterus may also be involved. Clearly estrogen and progesterone play  a major role in their growth, but that doesn't mean they cause fibroids  to form. 
 <strong>What Changes Can I Make Now?</strong>
 If  you have fibroids and no symptoms, no treatment is needed. If you do  have symptoms, your doctor will consider your age and how severe your  symptoms are. He or she will also want to know if you are planning  future pregnancies. Fibroids can grow rapidly during pregnancy. 
  There are many ways to treat fibroids. You and your doctor will make the  choice between medical and surgical options or one of the newer  approaches. 
 If you're in your 40s and symptoms aren't severe,  you may simply wait out your fibroids. They will likely shrink after  menopause, and symptoms should go away. 
 Meanwhile, you can use over-the-counter painkillers. These include: 
<ul><li>Acetaminophen (such as Tylenol) </li><li>Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs<br /><ul><li>Ibuprofen (such as Motrin, Advil) </li><li>Naproxen (such as Aleve) </li></ul></li></ul>
 To treat the anemia caused by heavy bleeding, increase your iron intake through diet and an iron supplement. 
  No medicine can prevent fibroids or guarantee that they won't return.  Right now, the primary medical option is injection with  gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists. An example is leuprolide  (Lupron), which was used in one of the new studies. These drugs are  given as a monthly shot. They suppress estrogen production by the  ovaries. 
 Without estrogen, fibroids shrink. But they usually  grow back once the drug is stopped. Side effects, similar to those of  menopause, are common. 
 Surgery to remove the uterus  (hysterectomy) is the ultimate cure for fibroid symptoms. Your decision  will depend largely on whether you might want more children or you are  willing to wait for menopause. 
 Other options include: 
<ul><li><strong>Myomectomy</strong> -- This operation removes only the fibroids. It preserves the uterus. </li><br /><br /><li><strong>Uterine artery embolization (also known as uterine fibroid embolization) </strong>  -- A radiologist inserts a thin tube called a catheter through the skin  into an artery in the groin. The catheter is pushed into the artery  that feeds blood to the uterus. Sand-sized particles are injected into  the uterine artery. The particles come together and cut off blood supply  to the fibroids. </li><br /><br /><li><strong>Magnetic resonance-guided intensity ultrasound</strong>  -- This treatment works by heating and shrinking the fibroid with  high-intensity ultrasound waves. MRI is used to see the fibroid and keep  track of temperature changes in the uterus during the procedure. This  is not widely available. It may not be covered by insurance. </li></ul>
 <strong>What Can I Expect Looking to the Future?</strong>
  This new drug ulipristal acetate sounds very promising as an  alternative to hormone-blocking shots. It appears to work at least as  well at shrinking fibroids and perhaps better. We don't know yet whether  ulipristal can be used long-term as an alternative to surgery or other  procedures. It is not approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.  It probably won't be approved for at least two more years. </div>]]></content:encoded>
			
			<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 07:10:00 -0500</pubDate>
			
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Tracking How Red Wine Chemical Works</title>
			<link>http://www.planforyourhealth.com/living-healthy/health-news/diet-fitness/diet-fitness-details/newsarticle/tracking-how-red-wine-chemical-works/</link>
			<description> U.S. government researchers think they may have found out how a  chemical in red wine appears to...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[ U.S. government researchers think they may have found out how a  chemical in red wine appears to confer health benefits. The research  looks at resveratrol. This chemical is found in red wine and some other  plant products. Researchers from the National Institutes of Health  traced how it acts in cells. They found that it interferes with the  activity of a protein in muscle called PDE4. This protein helps to  regulate cell energy. The drug rolipram is also known to interfere with  PDE4. So researchers gave this drug to mice. They found that this  produced the same results as resveratrol has in other studies. Mice were  less likely to get fat. Their bodies were able to make better use of  glucose, which can help prevent diabetes. They also were able to  exercise longer. Knowing how resveratrol works may help researchers to  develop drugs with the same effects. The National Institutes of Health  released the study results February 2. They were published online in the  journal Cell. 
<strong>What Is the Doctor's Reaction?</strong>
  If you're a social drinker, you are not alone. About two-thirds of  Americans report drinking alcohol on occasion. Many have a habit of  drinking every day. Some even claim their drinking is &quot;medicinal.&quot; Could  this be true? 
 Perhaps. There's substantial evidence that people  who drink in moderation have lower rates of death from heart and blood  vessel disease than those who don't drink at all. What does &quot;moderate&quot;  drinking mean? The evidence suggests this is up to one drink a day for  women or one to two drinks a day for men. 
 Naturally, there is  enormous interest in how drinking alcohol might provide health benefits.  Understanding this connection could lead to new preventive treatments  for people at risk of heart and blood vessel disease. It could also lead  to new treatments for those who already have heart problems. 
 A  new study explores a substance called resveratrol. This is an ingredient  in red wine thought to be responsible for at least some of its health  benefits. You may have heard about resveratrol. 
<ul><li>Past studies have linked it with a reduced risk of heart and blood vessel disease, diabetes and other health benefits. </li><li>Advertisements for pills containing resveratrol have become widespread. </li><li>A resveratrol researcher recently became the target of a scientific fraud investigation. </li></ul>
  In this latest research, scientists showed that resveratrol interferes  with a protein in muscle called PDE4. This action led to biochemical  changes linked with health benefits. These included improved blood  sugar, less obesity and improved physical stamina in mice. 
 This  research could lead to important medical progress. For one, it could  shift the focus from resveratrol to other chemicals that interfere with  PDE4. That could lead to safer and more effective treatments for heart  disease and other diseases. 
 While this story is exciting, it’s  unlikely to be the final word on resveratrol. This new study looked at  changes in how cells function and in how mice react to the supplement.  This doesn't mean the same is true in humans. We also don't know whether  long-term use causes unacceptable side effects. 
 The study's  lead author says that past research linking resveratrol to health  benefits in humans used very high doses. They were far higher than the  amount found in wine. If that's true, it suggests that if moderate  drinking is truly good for you, it's not because of resveratrol. 
 It's important to note that <em>too much</em> alcohol comes with an array of health risks. These include: 
<ul><li>Alcoholism</li><li>Liver disease</li><li>Depression</li><li>Some cancers</li><li>Injuries that occur after people drink too much</li></ul>
  It's difficult to talk about the potential health benefits of moderate  drinking without mentioning the downsides of drinking up. 
 <strong>What Changes Can I Make Now?</strong>
  You can make many changes now to reduce your risk of heart and blood  vessel disease. Increasing your red wine intake is not one that most  doctors will recommend. Part of this may simply be a concern that  moderate drinking could become excessive. 
 But a more compelling  argument is that we simply don't know whether someone who drinks little  or no alcohol actually gains health benefits by drinking more. All we  know is that people who drink have certain health benefits compared with  nondrinkers. This does not mean that alcohol <em>causes</em> the improved health. That's a common misunderstanding in medical research. 
  There also have not been any convincing, large-scale human studies  proving that resveratrol (in wine or in some other form) leads to better  health. 
 So if you're interested in improving your heart and  blood vessel health -- as we all should be -- here are a few steps you  can take: 
<ul><li>Don't smoke. Avoid secondhand smoke as well. </li><li>Exercise regularly. </li><li>Get  your blood pressure, blood sugar and cholesterol checked. If one or  more of these is not in an ideal range, talk to your doctor. Diet,  exercise and medicines often can help. </li><li>Improve your diet. Eat less saturated fat and trans fat. </li><li>Maintain a healthy weight. Take in fewer calories if you need to lose weight. </li><li>If  you already have heart or blood vessel disease (such as heart attack or  stroke), take your medicines as recommended. Let your doctor know about  your symptoms or any side effects from your medicines. </li></ul>
  Should you take resveratrol? Ask your doctor. My own view is that we  don't know enough about the effects on human health to recommend it. And  at least some of the data on this substance may have been exaggerated  or even faked. 
 <strong>What Can I Expect Looking to the Future?</strong>
  You can expect continued interest in resveratrol and other substances  that interfere with PDE4. In fact, just last year the U.S. Food and Drug  Administration approved one such medicine. This drug, roflumilast, was  approved for certain types of lung disease. 
 It's worth keeping  an eye on the resveratrol story. We may learn that resveratrol does  provide important health benefits. But I think it's at least as likely  that other components in alcohol and other supplements will be just as  good or better. ]]></content:encoded>
			
			<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 06:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
			
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Fast Heartbeat May Raise Stroke Risk</title>
			<link>http://www.planforyourhealth.com/living-healthy/health-news/healthy-living/healthy-living-details/newsarticle/fast-heartbeat-may-raise-stroke-risk/</link>
			<description> People with a very fast heartbeat that is not causing symptoms may  still have a higher risk of...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[ People with a very fast heartbeat that is not causing symptoms may  still have a higher risk of stroke, new research finds. The study  included 2,580 older adults with high blood pressure. All of them had a  pacemaker or defibrillator implanted to help control their heart rhythm.  This device kept a record of the speed and rhythm of their heart over  time. None of the people had a known history of atrial fibrillation.  This is a very fast, irregular rhythm in the heart's upper chambers. It  causes them to quiver rather than beat normally. Soon after the study  started, the devices recorded a very rapid heartbeat that lasted several  minutes in about 1 out of 10 people. They usually had no symptoms. But  in the next 2 ½ years they were more likely to develop lasting atrial  fibrillation. They also were more likely to have a stroke. The New  England Journal of Medicine published the study. HealthDay News and  MedPage Today wrote about it January 11. 
<strong>What Is the Doctor's Reaction?</strong>
  During a stroke, a part of the brain dies. Strokes can cause major  disability. It's not rare to lose your ability to walk, speak or live  independently. And strokes can kill. That's why we need better ways to  prevent strokes from occurring in the first place. 
 We have seen  advances in the understanding and treatment of strokes. But still nearly  800,000 are diagnosed in the United States each year. About 140,000  people die each year from complications of strokes. 
 High blood  pressure and diabetes are strongly linked with a higher risk of stroke.  We do have good ways to prevent and treat those conditions. But the  cause of up to 25% of strokes is unknown. A new study suggests a  potential explanation for many of these. 
 Researchers took  advantage of a &quot;side benefit&quot; of having a device, such as a pacemaker or  a defibrillator, implanted in the heart. These devices record the  rhythm of the heart. That way they can take control of the heart rhythm  when necessary. For example, a pacemaker may start firing when the heart  slows down to a dangerously low rate. A defibrillator will &quot;reset&quot; the  heart with an electrical shock if it detects a dangerous and unstable  heart rhythm. 
 These heart devices can also record fast heart  rhythms. One abnormal rhythm, called atrial fibrillation, is known to  increase the risk of stroke. During atrial fibrillation, the top part of  the heart does not beat in a regular rhythm. Instead, it quivers in a  chaotic way. This allows blood clots to form. They can travel to the  brain, causing a stroke. 
 This new study included more than 2.500  people over age 65. All of them had recently implanted heart devices.  Researchers used data from these devices to explore the relationship  between fast heart rhythms and stroke risk. The study lasted 2½ years.  In that time: 
<ul><li>About 10% of study subjects had lengthy episodes of a rapid heart rate</li><li>These rapid rhythms (which caused no symptoms) were often followed by atrial fibrillation</li><li>A rapid heart rate that lasted for a while was linked with an increased risk of stroke even if no atrial fibrillation occurred</li></ul>
 But this isn't the end of the story. Several questions remain: 
<ul><li>Did the implanted heart devices contribute to the rapid heart rates? </li><li>Do the findings of this study apply to people who do not have heart disease bad enough to require an implanted heart device? </li><li>Do the findings of this study apply to younger patients? </li></ul>
  These findings suggest that a rapid heart rate might account for many  strokes in people without other clear risk factors. And that could lead  to new preventive treatments. 
 <strong>What Changes Can I Make Now?</strong>
  You may be able to reduce your risk of developing atrial fibrillation  or other rapid heart rhythms that increase the risk of stroke. Here's  what you can do: 
<ul><li>Avoid heavy drinking of alcohol. </li><li>Don't smoke. </li><li>Lose excess weight. </li><li>Exercise regularly. </li><li>Get your blood pressure checked. Get treatment if it's high. </li><li>Have tests of your thyroid gland if you're taking thyroid medicine. </li></ul>
 If you already have atrial fibrillation, your doctor may recommend treatments such as: 
<ul><li>Medicines to slow the heart</li><li>Medicines to encourage the heart to remain in a normal, regular rhythm </li><li>Blood thinners, to prevent clots</li><li>A  minor heart procedure to interrupt signals traveling between the  chambers of the heart (though this may require an artificial pacemaker) </li></ul>
  Besides an abnormal heart rhythm, several other factors increase the  risk of stroke. Many of them can be reversed. The most important of  these and ways to address them include: 
<ul><li>Lack of exercise -- Try to get regular exercise for at least 45 minutes most days of the week. </li><li>Smoking -- Make quitting a priority. </li><li>High  blood pressure (hypertension) -- Have your blood pressure checked. If  it's high, limit your salt intake and lose excess weight. If necessary,  take medicines that your doctor recommends. </li><li>Diabetes -- Try to  maintain tight control of your blood sugar. This may lower your risk of  further health problems, including stroke. </li><li>High cholesterol  -- If your HDL, LDL and total cholesterol are not in ideal ranges, talk  to your doctor about how to improve them. </li><li>Carotid artery  narrowing -- These arteries are in the neck and supply blood to the  brain. Sometimes they become narrowed by a buildup of fatty deposits  inside. A surgical procedure can open up the artery, reducing stroke  risk. </li></ul>
 <strong>What Can I Expect Looking to the Future?</strong>
  It's hard to prevent something when you don't know its cause. This  latest research suggests that an abnormally fast heart rate may increase  the risk of stroke. Expect to hear about more research that examines  ways to detect and treat rapid heart rhythms. It's quite possible that  this approach will reduce new cases of stroke. ]]></content:encoded>
			
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 13:44:00 -0500</pubDate>
			
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Nicotine Patch May Aid Memory Problems</title>
			<link>http://www.planforyourhealth.com/living-healthy/health-news/conditions/health-conditions-details/newsarticle/nicotine-patch-may-aid-memory-problems/</link>
			<description> Wearing a nicotine patch may provide a small boost for older adults  with mild losses in attention...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Wearing a nicotine patch may provide a small boost for older adults  with mild losses in attention and memory, a study suggests. The study  included 67 older adults with mild cognitive impairment. This is a  decline in mental function that is not severe enough to be called  dementia. People with this condition are more likely to develop  dementia, however. People in the study were randomly assigned to wear  either a nicotine patch or a placebo (fake) patch for 6 months. Test  scores for reaction times, attention and long-term memory improved among  those wearing the nicotine patch. Their short-term memory did not  improve as much. Test scores went down for people wearing the placebo  patch. The journal Neurology published the study. The New York Times and  HealthDay News wrote about it January 9. 
<strong>What Is the Doctor's Reaction?</strong>
 We know smoking is bad for your health. But could nicotine be good for your brain? 
 The answer is &quot;maybe,&quot; according to a new study. The medical journal Neurology published it. 
  Previous research has shown improved measures of brain function among  people using nicotine treatments. For example, when they chewed nicotine  gum, they were better able to pay attention to a complex task. A study  of people with Alzheimer's disease also found that nicotine infused into  a vein seemed to improve memory and attention. 
 This latest  research looked at people whose brain function was not entirely normal,  but not as abnormal as in people with dementia. This is known as &quot;mild  cognitive impairment.&quot; People with this condition have difficulty with  memory or thinking. However, they are not disabled by it. They do have a  high risk of developing Alzheimer's disease or another form of  dementia. 
 In this study, 74 elderly men and women with mild  cognitive impairment were randomly divided into two groups. One group  wore patches containing nicotine. The other wore placebo patches. The  dose was similar to what someone who smokes 10 cigarettes or fewer per  day might use while trying to quit. 
 After six months of  treatment, long-term memory improved significantly among those wearing  the nicotine patch. Meanwhile, memory test scores got worse for those  wearing placebo patches. No major side effects were reported. 
  These results were surprising. But there is a potential scientific  explanation. One of the ways the brain responds to nicotine is by  releasing a chemical messenger called glutamate. This chemical is  involved in memory and learning. 
 Interesting? Yes! But does this  study mean that smoking might not be so bad for you? Does it mean that  you should use nicotine to improve your memory? Not yet! It's too early  to embrace nicotine as a way to ward off Alzheimer's disease or reverse  cognitive impairment. Here's why: 
<ul><li>The study was quite  small. A larger study would provide a more reliable measure of whether  nicotine helps people with mild cognitive impairment. </li><li>Doctors evaluating people in the study did <em>not</em> detect overall improvement among those receiving nicotine treatment. The changes were shown only in test scores. </li><li>This  study provides no information about the ideal dose or how long  treatment should last. Cognitive impairment and dementia usually can't  be reversed. So long-term treatment would likely be needed. </li><li>The  safety of long-term use of nicotine among the elderly is not known. A  small study lasting only 6 months cannot assure us that this approach is  safe. </li><li>Smoking is linked with many serious health problems.  Even if other studies confirm a benefit for nicotine, the risks of  smoking would still far outweigh the benefits. Nicotine treatment might  be recommended in the future for its effects on the brain. But this  would take the form of nicotine gum or patches. Smoking would never be  recommended. </li></ul>
 <strong>What Changes Can I Make Now?</strong>
  You can make changes now that may reduce your risk of cognitive  impairment or dementia. But it's too soon to say that the use of  nicotine should be one of them.
 Here's what you can do now. 
<ul><li>Exercise regularly. </li><li>Improve your diet. Make sure it includes more fruits, vegetables, fiber and omega-3 fatty acids (such as those found in fish). </li><li>Keep your blood pressure in a normal range. </li><li>Keep your blood lipids (such as cholesterol) in a healthy range. </li><li>Maintain a healthy weight. </li><li>Don't smoke (despite the findings of this study). </li><li>&quot;Exercise&quot;  your mind. It's not clearly proven, but a busy social life, hobbies and  activities that challenge your brain (such as crossword puzzles) may be  linked with a lower risk of dementia. </li></ul>
 For those already  diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease, medicines intended to slow the  decline in mental function are available. If you're worried that your  memory or thinking abilities are declining, see your doctor. He or she  can evaluate you or refer you to a doctor who focuses on brain function  (such as a neurologist or a neuropsychologist). The good news is that  many people who are concerned about their memory as they age discover  that their memory is actually normal. 
 <strong>What Can I Expect Looking to the Future?</strong>
  It's not yet clear that nicotine will ever be used to prevent or treat  dementia. But this new study should promote more research. We'll need  more studies to find out whether a substance with such a bad reputation  could actually provide hope for those at risk of developing dementia. ]]></content:encoded>
			
			<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 14:53:00 -0500</pubDate>
			
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Rare Genes May Allow Super-Long Lives</title>
			<link>http://www.planforyourhealth.com/living-healthy/health-news/healthy-living/healthy-living-details/newsarticle/rare-genes-may-allow-super-long-lives/</link>
			<description> People who live to be at least 110 may be protected from disease by  rare differences in some...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[ People who live to be at least 110 may be protected from disease by  rare differences in some genes, a new study suggests. Researchers  analyzed the entire genetic makeup (genome) of two people. The man and  woman had both lived past the age of 114. Both had about as many gene  mutations linked to disease as most people. But each of them also had  other gene mutations that had not been seen before. Researchers said  it's possible these gene differences are linked with longer life. The  journal Frontiers in Genetics published the study. HealthDay News wrote  about it January 8. 
<strong>What Is the Doctor's Reaction?</strong>
  Today, life expectancy at birth is close to 80 years in the United  States. This is a great leap forward from 1900. At that time, the  average newborn couldn't expect to reach age 50. 
 If you live to  celebrate certain milestones of age, your life expectancy stretches. The  longer you live, the longer you're likely to live. In fact, if you make  it to 90, there is a reasonable chance you can reach 100. And a few  will reach 110. These are the supercentenarians. 
 What allows  some people to live so long? First, they need to lead healthy  lifestyles. They also need to be fortunate to live in a nontoxic  environment that has a low level of infectious diseases. 
 During  the first 85 years of life, genetics plays a smaller role. The genes you  inherit from your parents account for only 20% to 25% of the reasons  that you make it to that age. Not smoking, limiting alcohol, eating  healthfully and getting plenty of exercise matter the most. 
 Once  you hit your mid-80s, your genes matter more and more. And once your  reach your 90s, how much longer you are likely to live was determined  the day your father's sperm fertilized your mother's egg. 
 Thomas  Perls, M.D., has led many studies helping us understand why some people  can live well past 100. Now he and his colleagues provide more exciting  new information. It is based on a complete sequencing of the genome of  two people who lived past their 114th birthdays. Results appear in the  most recent issue of the journal Frontiers in Genetics. 
 The two supercentenarians had: 
<ul><li>DNA that appeared to be very similar to people who did not have long lives</li><li>The same number of known disease-linked genes as most other human genomes sequenced so far</li><li>A small number of genes that were unexpected and not seen before -- perhaps these new genes might be life-extenders</li></ul>
  The research results suggest that some common and rare genes linked  with long life may offset the disease-linked genes. This might then  allow an extended lifespan. 
 <strong>What Changes Can I Make Now?</strong>
 No need to get your genome analyzed yet. It won't change what you need to do now. 
 You have the power to change many thinks that influence your health and how long you live. Here are 10 steps to take: 
<ol><li>Don't smoke. </li><li>Build physical and mental activities into every day. </li><li>Eat  a healthy diet rich in whole grains, vegetables and fruits. Reduce or  avoid unhealthy saturated fats and trans fats. Instead, use healthier  monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fats. </li><li>If you worry that  your diet does not provide enough vitamins and minerals, take a daily  multivitamin. Also be sure to get enough calcium and vitamin D. </li><li>Maintain a healthy weight and body shape. </li><li>Challenge your mind. </li><li>Build a strong social network. </li><li>Protect your sight, hearing and general health by following preventive care guidelines. </li><li>Floss,  brush and see a dentist regularly. Poor oral health may have many  effects. It can lead to poor nutrition, pain and possibly even a higher  risk of heart disease and stroke. </li><li>Discuss with your doctor  whether you need any medicine to help you stay healthy. These might  include medicines to control high blood pressure, treat osteoporosis or  lower cholesterol, for example. </li></ol>
 <strong>What Can I Expect Looking to the Future?</strong>
  Researchers will sequence and analyze the genomes of more people who  survive to extremely old age. This will provide new insight into what  allows us to maintain health after we reach 80. But to reach a healthy  80, lifestyle choices and environment will always be the more important  issues. ]]></content:encoded>
			
			<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 13:23:00 -0500</pubDate>
			
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>FDA Limits Some Antibiotics for Animals</title>
			<link>http://www.planforyourhealth.com/living-healthy/health-news/healthy-living/healthy-living-details/newsarticle/fda-limits-some-antibiotics-for-animals/</link>
			<description> The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has taken a first step  to limit use of antibiotics in...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[ The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has taken a first step  to limit use of antibiotics in some animals raised for food. The FDA  said it would restrict use of cephalosporin antibiotics. They are  injected into some cattle, pigs and poultry just before slaughter. These  antibiotics are not used as often in animals as some others. But they  are frequently needed to treat serious human infections. The number of  infections that &quot;resist&quot; one or more antibiotics has been increasing  rapidly. Many experts say one reason is the routine use of antibiotics  in animals raised for food. The FDA said in 2010 that this use of  antibiotics was &quot;a serious health threat.&quot; But this week's action is the  agency's first to address the threat. The Associated Press wrote about  it January 4. 
<strong>What Is the Doctor's Reaction?</strong>
  The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has introduced its first  rule that will limit the use of antibiotics in livestock and poultry  farming. This is welcome news to me, a primary care doctor. Doctors need  to limit their antibiotic use to times when it is most needed -- and so  do farmers. Otherwise, antibiotics lose their power. Bacteria strains  become drug-resistant. 
 When I diagnose a new infection in one of  my patients today, I hesitate as I pick out what antibiotic to use. We  are seeing more and more drug-resistant bacteria. This makes me worry  each time I treat an infection. I tell them to call me so I can hear  that they are doing better. If they don't get better, I may have to put  them into the hospital for a while. In that case, I'll pull out the &quot;big  gun&quot; antibiotics. The worrisome thing is, we don't have too many &quot;big  guns&quot; left. 
 We run into drug-resistant bacteria in medical care  really often. How much of the problem comes from use of antibiotics on  farms? We can't say. But it definitely contributes. 
 Many  commercial farms crowd animals into a small living and feeding area.  These farms routinely use antibiotics in healthy animals. They are used  to prevent infection and to help the animals grow. The amount of  antibiotics used in agriculture is huge. The FDA says 24.6 million  pounds of antibiotics are used each year in swine, poultry and cattle  purely for the sake of prevention. 
 Antibiotics in feed allow our  meat animals to grow larger, and to cost less. But the other result is  more antibiotic resistance. From my vantage point, the trade-off is not  worth it. 
 Antibiotics kill bacteria that are not resistant. This  leaves behind any bacteria that are protected from antibiotics by a  special gene. These &quot;resistant&quot; bacteria can then multiply. They become  &quot;the new normal.&quot; 
 After antibiotic use in animals,  drug-resistant strains of bacteria end up on the skin of animals.  Farmers, butchers and consumers touch the skin. The drug-resistant  bacteria also end up in the dirt and water. This allows them to  contaminate vegetables, too. 
 Several years ago, researchers  looked at 200 chicken, beef, turkey and pork samples from groceries in  Washington, D.C. They found that 1 out of 5 samples contained salmonella  bacteria. About 84% of the salmonella found was resistant to at least 1  antibiotic. About 53% was resistant to at least 3 antibiotics. 
  In a separate study, scientists took samples from 136 packages of meat  and poultry. The samples came from 4 states and the District of  Columbia. They found <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em> bacteria in 47% of the samples. Many of these bacteria samples were drug-resistant, too. 
  A study from the Netherlands examined dirt samples taken at different  times in farming history. Genes that resist some types of antibiotics  were 15 times more abundant in today's dirt than dirt from several  decades ago. 
 <strong>What Changes Can I Make Now?</strong>
  Keep an eye out for further news about antibiotics for farm use. In the  meantime, use antibiotics for your own infections only when necessary.  You don't need antibiotics for acute bronchitis or for the common cold,  acne or sinus symptoms that last fewer than seven days. 
 When you prepare food at home, take care to handle it properly. 
<ul><li>Wash your hands before and after food preparation. </li><li>Rinse fruits and vegetables well. Keep them away from surfaces that you have been using to prepare meats. </li><li>Keep raw and cooked meats refrigerated. </li><li>Respect expiration dates. </li><li>Cook meats thoroughly. This is especially important for ground meats and for poultry. </li><li>Avoid eating raw meat, fish or eggs. </li></ul>
 <strong>What Can I Expect Looking to the Future?</strong>
  The U.S. government set up a system to keep track of drug-resistant  bacteria way back in 1996. This system regularly checks our food supply  for disease-causing bacteria. It also checks these bacteria for drug  resistance. Later, the Interagency Task Force on Antimicrobial  Resistance was created. It includes 10 U.S. agencies involved in health.  In 2001, the task force published a plan to fight drug resistance in  bacteria and other microbes. It is now writing an updated draft. 
  The government has monitored industry practice for 15 years. Yet this  week's announcement is the FDA's first rule that restricts antibiotic  use on farms. It limits only antibiotics used for prevention. It does  not affect drugs used for treatment of infections. It also applies to  only one class of antibiotic. We can expect to see the FDA expand this  program. 
 We receive much of our food through large-scale produce  distribution and imports. For example, food imports have almost doubled  during the last 10 years. About 25% of all of the fruits and vegetables  we eat in the United States are imported. This makes it challenging to  monitor quality and to inspect food. It is a good reason to buy foods  that are produced locally. ]]></content:encoded>
			
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 07:08:00 -0500</pubDate>
			
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Other Neck-Pain Treatments Beat Drugs</title>
			<link>http://www.planforyourhealth.com/living-healthy/health-news/healthy-living/healthy-living-details/newsarticle/other-neck-pain-treatments-beat-drugs/</link>
			<description> Spinal manipulation and home exercise may relieve neck pain better  than medicines, new research...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Spinal manipulation and home exercise may relieve neck pain better  than medicines, new research suggests. The study included 272 people.  They had felt neck pain for 2 to 12 weeks before the study began. They  were randomly divided into 3 groups. One group received spinal  manipulation treatments. The second group took over-the-counter pain  medicines, or prescription drugs if needed. The third group was trained  to do home exercises for the neck. The study lasted 12 weeks. By the  end, 82% of the spinal manipulation group reported that their pain was  reduced by at least half. This compares with 69% of those on medicines  and 77% of those who did home exercises. At least 30% of the spinal  manipulation and exercise groups said all of their pain was gone. About  13% of the medicine group reported no pain. After a year, pain was gone  for 27% of those who had spinal manipulation and 37% of those who did  exercises. About 17% of the medicine group reported no pain. The journal  Annals of Internal Medicine published the study. HealthDay News wrote  about it January 2. 
<strong>What Is the Doctor's Reaction?</strong>
  Neck pain is a common and bothersome symptom. It's estimated that 75%  of adults will suffer with major neck pain at some point. 
 Muscle spasm and arthritis are among the most common causes of neck pain. For many people, though, there is no clear cause. 
  Unfortunately, no single treatment works well for everyone. People  often take nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (such as ibuprofen) or  acetaminophen for neck pain. However, heat or massage may work as well. 
  Some people swear by spinal manipulation to treat their neck pain. In  this treatment, a chiropractor or other health professional person  presses carefully on part of the spine. Scientists have looked at how  well this works compared with other common treatments. But these studies  have reached different conclusions. 
 That why this new study is  important. It included 272 adults with neck pain that had lasted from 2  to 12 weeks. They were randomly divided into 3 groups. Each group  received one of these treatments for 3 months: 
<ul><li>Spinal manipulation -- This treatment also included &quot;limited light soft-tissue massage.&quot;</li><li>Medicine -- People took anti-inflammatory drugs. They included ibuprofen, narcotics and muscle relaxants.</li><li>Home  exercise with advice -- People in this group met one-on-one with a  health care professional for an hour on two occasions. They reviewed  gentle exercises that could be done at home. They also learned about  neck anatomy and proper techniques for lifting and other common  activities. </li></ul>
 Up to a year later, people in the spinal  manipulation and exercise groups reported equal pain relief. Both of  these groups reported more pain relief than those assigned to take  medicines. Those who had spinal manipulation were more satisfied with  their care than those in the other treatment groups. 
 This research raises several questions. 
<ul><li>Why  did people who had spinal manipulation improve as much as or more than  the others? Could it have been the result of frequent contact with a  health provider? People in this group had an average of 15 visits during  the 12 weeks of the study. On average, the exercise group had only 2  visits. People in the medicine group met 5 times with their doctors.</li><br /><br /><li>Why were people more satisfied with spinal manipulation than with exercise even though pain relief was similar?</li><br /><br /><li>Would  similar results be seen in people whose neck pain had lasted longer  (more than 3 months) or those with nerve compression from a damaged  disc? </li><br /><br /><li>What are the risks of spinal manipulation of the  neck? How can they be eliminated? No problems were reported in this  study. But there were too few people in the study to detect rare  problems. Rare cases of spinal cord and major artery injury after neck  manipulation have been reported in the past. These injuries can have  serious effects. </li></ul>
 More research is needed to answer these questions. 
 <strong>What Changes Can I Make Now?</strong>
 You may be able to prevent neck pain with some simple measures. 
<ul><li>Change  your work environment. For example, you could arrange the position of  your computer and chair to reduce stress on your neck.</li><li>Keep active. If you work long hours at a computer, get up and move around. Stretching regularly can be helpful.</li><li>Use a headset or speaker phone if you are on the phone often. Avoid holding the phone wedged between your ear and shoulder.</li><li>Keep your purse or briefcase light. </li></ul>
  If your neck pain that isn't getting better on its own, talk to your  doctor. He or she can look into the cause and make sure it's nothing  serious. A serious cause may be more likely if you have: 
<ul><li>Fever</li><li>Headache</li><li>A very stiff neck </li><li>Pain that moves down an arm or leg, particularly if the limb also feels weak, numb or tingly </li><li>Difficulty controlling your bowel or bladder</li><li>Swelling of the lymph nodes (&quot;glands&quot;) in the neck</li><li>A history of major trauma or cancer</li></ul>
  Once any serious causes have been ruled out, you and your doctor can  decide on a treatment plan. Besides the treatments used in this study,  options include: 
<ul><li>Heat</li><li>Physical therapy</li><li>Injections of medicines near the source of pain (such as a disc that is squeezing a nerve)</li><li>Massage</li><li>Acupuncture</li></ul>
 Surgery is another option, but it is generally a last resort. It helps only certain causes of neck pain, such as disc disease. 
  If further research confirms this new study, spinal manipulation may be  an effective first treatment for neck pain. But it also may cost more  and take longer than other options that are just as effective or nearly  so. For many people, using more than one treatment may work best. 
 <strong>What Can I Expect Looking to the Future?</strong>
  Neck pain is one of the most common reasons that people visit a doctor.  Therefore, you can expect to hear about other treatments that work  better than current options. We will need more research on spinal  manipulation in the treatment of neck pain. This should include studies  on which people are most likely to improve and which types of  manipulation are safest and most effective. ]]></content:encoded>
			
			<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 14:14:00 -0500</pubDate>
			
		</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
