<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		
		<title>Aetna Latest Healthy Living News</title>
		<link>http://www.planforyourhealth.com/</link>
		<description>Latest Healthy Living News from Aetna</description>
		<language>en</language>
		
		<generator>TYPO3 - get.content.right</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		
		
		
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 14:05:00 -0400</lastBuildDate>
		
		
		<item>
			<title>Stroke Care Costs Projected to Double</title>
			<link>http://www.planforyourhealth.com/living-healthy/health-news/healthy-living/healthy-living-details/newsarticle/stroke-care-costs-projected-to-double/</link>
			<description> The costs of treating stroke will more than double by 2030, a new  report says. The main reason...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[ The costs of treating stroke will more than double by 2030, a new  report says. The main reason given is the aging of the U.S. population.  American Heart Association and the American Stroke Association released  the policy statement. It predicts that the actual number of strokes will  rise 20%. Stroke care costs are projected to jump from about $72  billion in 2010 to $183 billion in 2030. The result will be a strain on  the health care system, an expert told HealthDay News. Lost productivity  would cost another $57 billion, the policy statement says. That's up  from $34 billion in 2010. About 90% of people who survive a stroke are  left with some type of disability. Strokes are expected to increase most  among people ages 45 to 64 years old, and among Hispanics. The journal  Stroke published the statement. HealthDay News wrote about it May 22.

<strong>What Is the Doctor's Reaction?</strong>
  Stroke is the fourth leading cause of death in the United States. And  it could move even higher on the list. Advancing age is a major factor  that increases the risk of stroke. The aging of the baby boomer  generation is expected to contribute to rising stroke rates in the  coming years. 
 So it should not be surprising to learn that  experts also predict an increase in the costs of caring for people with  stroke. What surprised me is how <em>much</em> of an increase. 
 A new report in the medical journal Stroke predicts these changes by 2030: 
<ul><li>The number of people having strokes will increase by 20%.</li><li>The  costs to care for people with stroke will more than double. Compared  with current spending, that's an increase from $72 billion to $183  billion. And that doesn't count $57 billion in lost productivity. </li><li>The biggest increases in stroke are expected to affect those ages 45 to 64, Hispanics and the uninsured. </li></ul>
  These estimates are clearly cause for concern. But I think they also  represent an opportunity. There is much that can be done to reduce the  number of strokes in the future. 
 <strong>What Changes Can I Make Now?</strong>
 Changes you make now can reduce your chances of having a stroke. 
 Learn about the factors that increase the risk of stroke and what you can do about them. They include: 
<ul><li><strong>Inactivity</strong> -- Exercise for at least 45 minutes most days of the week. </li><li><strong>Smoking</strong>  -- If you smoke now, make a commitment to quit. If you cannot quit on  your own, ask your doctor about programs that can help. Avoid secondhand  smoke as well. </li><li><strong>High blood pressure (hypertension)</strong> --  Have your blood pressure checked regularly. If it's high, cut back on  salt and lose excess weight. If necessary, take medicines your doctor  recommends. </li><li><strong>Diabetes</strong> -- Medicines, changes in diet and  loss of excess weight may reduce your risk of diabetes-related health  problems, including stroke. </li><li><strong>Obesity</strong> -- Excess weight  increases the risk of diabetes, high blood pressure and other risk  factors for stroke. Therefore, it's helpful to maintain a healthy  weight. </li><li><strong>An unhealthy lipid profile</strong> -- If you have blood  lipids (such as total and LDL cholesterol) that are not in an ideal  range, talk to your doctor. Diet, exercise and medicines often can  improve them. </li><li><strong>Atrial fibrillation</strong> -- This is a type of  irregular heartbeat. Your doctor may detect it during routine medical  care or while evaluating symptoms. For example, you may have  palpitations or feel lightheaded. If you have atrial fibrillation,  consider taking a blood thinner, such as warfarin (Coumadin), which can  lower the risk of stroke. </li><li><strong>Narrow carotid arteries</strong> --  The carotid arteries are in the neck and supply blood to the brain. If  narrowed by atherosclerosis, they can be opened up with a surgical  procedure. This improves blood flow to the brain and reduces the risk of  stroke. </li><li><strong>Depression</strong> -- Recent studies have shown a link  between depression and stroke. However, we don't know whether treatment  of depression lowers stroke risk. </li></ul>
 Find out if you have a  family history of heart and blood vessel disease, such as heart attack  or stroke. If you have a strong family history, changing your other risk  factors is even more important. 
 Know the symptoms of stroke.  Prompt treatment by experienced stroke experts gives you the best chance  for a good recovery. If you have stroke symptoms, call for emergency  care right away. 
 Symptoms of stroke usually occur suddenly. They may include: 
<ul><li>Confusion</li><li>Trouble speaking or understanding what is said</li><li>Difficulty walking or loss of balance</li><li>Vision loss</li><li>Numbness or weakness of one side of the body or face</li><li>Severe headache</li></ul>
  Plan ahead. If you have risk factors for stroke, talk to your doctor  about which hospitals near you are able to provide state-of-the-art  stroke care. 
 <strong>What Can I Expect Looking to the Future?</strong>
  Future research may help explain why some people are more likely to  have a stroke than others. For example, it's not clear why Hispanics are  at higher risk than other ethnic groups. 
 If we reduce our risk  factors, we can prevent many strokes. Universal health insurance  coverage and a focus on preventive health measures could also help  reduce strokes. These are two key goals of the 2010 Affordable Care Act.  
 With these positive changes, we may be able to avoid a dramatic  increase in stroke rates and costs of care. If so, today's estimates  could prove to be a &quot;worst case scenario&quot; that never actually happens.]]></content:encoded>
			
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 14:05:00 -0400</pubDate>
			
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Better Sunscreen Labels Still May Mislead</title>
			<link>http://www.planforyourhealth.com/living-healthy/health-news/healthy-living/healthy-living-details/newsarticle/better-sunscreen-labels-still-may-mislead/</link>
			<description> Sunscreens that Americans buy this summer should have more accurate  labels. Updated rules from...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Sunscreens that Americans buy this summer should have more accurate  labels. Updated rules from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) took  effect in December. But a consumer group says some labels may still be  misleading. Sunscreens have a sun protection factor (SPF) to indicate  how well they work. The FDA says sunscreens with an SPF of 15 to 50 can  claim protection against skin cancer and early aging, as well as  sunburn. The FDA says there's no proof that protection increases further  for numbers above 50. But an Environmental Working Group survey found  higher numbers on 1 out of 7 products. The group checked 1,400  sunscreens. Experts worry that numbers above 50 could encourage people  to stay out in the sun longer. The new FDA rules require all &quot;broad  spectrum&quot; sunscreens to protect against both UVA and UVB rays. Both can  cause skin cancer. UVA rays also cause skin aging. UVB rays cause  sunburns. Under the new rules, sunscreens also cannot claim to be  &quot;waterproof.&quot; They can claim to be &quot;water resistant&quot; for either 40 or 80  minutes. The Associated Press wrote about the rules May 20. 

<strong>What Is the Doctor's Reaction?</strong>
 It took more than 30 years. But finally sunscreens will need to show accurate labels. 
  The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released new guidelines for  sunscreen labels in 2011. The agency told the manufacturers they had a  year to get their products tested to comply with the new rules and make  the labels accurate. The FDA gave them extra time beyond the one year. 
  But now the sunscreens you buy must comply with the new rules. They  must be tested for protection against ultraviolet A and B rays. UVA rays  cause wrinkles. UVB rays cause sunburn. Both can cause skin cancer. 
  Sunscreens carry a sun protection factor (SPF) rating to show how well  they protect against sunburn. SPF is a measurement of how much longer it  takes for your skin to turn red from the sun after applying the  sunscreen. For example, let's say your skin turns red after 10 minutes  in the sun. Sunscreen with an SPF of 15 would prevent your skin from  turning red for 150 minutes under the same conditions. 
 The SPF  level must be 15 or higher for both types of rays. Products that don't  meet this standard must carry a warning. The American Academy of  Dermatology recommends using products with an SPF of 30, up to 50. 
  The FDA says there's no proof that numbers above 50 provide more  protection. Despite that, 1 in 7 product labels still claims an SPF  higher than 50, according to a consumer group. 
 The FDA also  requires sunscreen labels to be more accurate with the use of terms. If a  label says &quot;broad spectrum,&quot; the product must pass tests proving that  it truly protects against both UVA and UVB rays. Always choose broad  spectrum sunscreens to decrease cancer risk. The rules ban the terms  &quot;sunblock,&quot; &quot;waterproof&quot; and &quot;sweatproof.&quot; Sunscreens can be labeled as  &quot;water resistant.&quot; They should indicate how long they provide protection  after water exposure or sweating, either 40 or 80 minutes. 
 <strong>What Changes Can I Make Now?</strong>
  Apply sunscreen before you go out. Make sure you apply enough and apply  often. Use 1 ounce of sunscreen (a shot glass full) to cover your body  and face. Reapply sunscreen right away after swimming or heavy sweating.  Apply every 2 hours if you don't get in the water and don't sweat. 
  Even the best sunscreens can't protect you from all of the sun's rays.  Here are some other ways to protect yourself from skin cancers, sunburn  and early aging of skin: 
<ul><li>Wear clothing made from tightly woven fabrics or those that absorb UV light. </li><li>Avoid the sun from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m., when its rays are most intense. </li><li>Wear a wide-brimmed hat to keep UV rays off your face. </li><li>Stay in the shade. </li><li>Pay attention to reflections from water, sand and (in the winter) snow. </li><li>Watch  for news reports that give the UV index in your area. A UV index  reading of 2 or less means low danger from the sun's UV rays for the  average person. </li><li>Examine your skin regularly for any new moles or changes in moles. Ask your doctor about any changes you see. </li></ul>
  The downside of avoiding the sun and full protection is the risk of  vitamin D deficiency. Buy foods and drinks fortified with vitamin D. Or  consider a vitamin D supplement. I recommend a vitamin D3 supplement at a  dose of 1,000 international units (IU) daily. 
 <strong>What Can I Expect Looking to the Future?</strong>
  Excessive sun exposure and other sources of UV rays increase the risk  of the different types of skin cancer. Of these, melanoma is the one  that doctors worry about most. It's the deadliest. 
 Current  research suggests that sunburns, especially before age 19, substantially  raise melanoma risk. This likely is true for burns related to indoor  tanning as well.]]></content:encoded>
			
			<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:45:00 -0400</pubDate>
			
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Depression Raises Midlife Women's Stroke Risk</title>
			<link>http://www.planforyourhealth.com/living-healthy/health-news/healthy-living/healthy-living-details/newsarticle/depression-raises-midlife-womens-stroke-risk/</link>
			<description> Women in their 40s and 50s have a very low risk of stroke, but the  risk doubles if they are...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Women in their 40s and 50s have a very low risk of stroke, but the  risk doubles if they are depressed, a new study finds. The study  included 10,547 women who had no history of stroke. Their ages ranged  between 47 and 52 when the study began. Researchers had them fill out  health surveys every 3 years for the next 12 years. In that time, 177  women had strokes. The stroke rate among women with depression was 2.4  times as high as for women without depression. Depressed women also were  more likely to have other health factors, such as smoking, that  increased their risk of stroke. After researchers accounted for those  factors, depression alone almost doubled the women's risk of stroke.  Overall, about 1.5% of the women had strokes during the study. The  journal Stroke published the study. HealthDay News wrote about it May  16. 

<strong>What Is the Doctor's Reaction?</strong>
  Stroke is a major cause of long-term disability and death in the United  States. Women have a higher lifetime risk of stroke than men. This is  especially true for women in middle age. And the risk has been  increasing. 
 Stroke rates in midlife women have risen during the  last 25 years. Some estimates suggest they might have tripled. Stroke  rates in men of similar age stayed flat over this same period. 
  Scientists don't know why stroke rates have increased for midlife women,  and not for men. Depression seems to be a likely contributor. Prior  studies have shown a definite link between depression and stroke in both  sexes. But depression rates in women are twice as high as in men  throughout the lifespan. 
 The results of this study add more  evidence to the link between depression and stroke among women. The data  came from the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health. The  researchers enrolled women ages 47 to 52 to look at their health during  early midlife. 
 To identify depression, the researchers used a  depression scale or recent use of an antidepressant drug. Of the 10,547  women, 24% were depressed. The stroke rate in the depressed women was  2.4 times as high as in non-depressed women. 
 Women with depression were more likely to have other factors that increased the risk of stroke. They included: 
<ul><li>Smoking</li><li>High blood pressure</li><li>Heart disease</li><li>Diabetes</li><li>Lack of exercise </li><li>Overweight and obesity</li></ul>
  When the researchers took out the impact of these risk factors,  depressed women still had 1.9 times the stroke rate of non-depressed  women. 
 Other studies have also found somewhat higher stroke  rates for depressed women, primarily women in later stages of midlife.  But depression made an even bigger difference in stroke rates for the  younger midlife women in this new study. 
 This is not proof that  depression causes stroke. But many experts do think there is a  biological connection. We just haven't discovered it yet. 
 <strong>What Changes Can I Make Now?</strong>
 Depression isn't the same in everyone. And feeling sad might not be the major symptom. 
 Here are some of the other symptoms: 
<ul><li>Feeling helpless or hopeless</li><li>Loss of interest in activities you used to enjoy</li><li>Trouble concentrating or remembering things</li><li>Sleep changes (can't sleep or sleep too much) </li><li>Anger or irritability</li><li>Appetite or weight changes (can be either more or less) </li><li>Reckless behavior, such as excessive alcohol use or reckless driving </li><li>Feeling worthless</li></ul>
 There may be reasons other than depression for these symptoms. But depression is one of the most common causes. 
  Obviously, you should seek treatment if you have depression. But also  recognize the link between depression and other medical problems such as  heart disease, diabetes and obesity. Taking positive action to improve  your health can also lessen your symptoms of depression. 
 <strong>What Can I Expect Looking to the Future?</strong>
  Depression not only increases stroke risk, it also means you are more  likely to have a heart attack or develop other types of heart disease.  We don't yet know if and what types of depression treatment will help  lower these risks. This is an area of active research. 
 My  prediction is that scientists will discover a biological or genetic  reason that puts a person at risk for all three -- depression, heart  disease and stroke.]]></content:encoded>
			
			<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 13:53:00 -0400</pubDate>
			
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Pelvic Surgery Failure Increases with Time</title>
			<link>http://www.planforyourhealth.com/living-healthy/health-news/healthy-living/healthy-living-details/newsarticle/pelvic-surgery-failure-increases-with-time/</link>
			<description> Surgery to repair pelvic organ prolapse fails over time for many  women, a new study concludes....</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Surgery to repair pelvic organ prolapse fails over time for many  women, a new study concludes. Pelvic organ prolapse occurs when the  tissues that support the uterus, bladder and cervix are damaged or relax  over time. The organs may push down into the top of the vagina. This  can cause pain, bleeding and urinary problems. The study included 215  women. All had an operation called sacrocolpopexy to support the organs  with a synthetic material called surgical mesh. Half also had another  procedure to stop problems with urine leakage. The rate of failure  increased each year in both groups. For example, symptoms returned  within 2 years for 14% of the women who had both procedures. The return  of symptoms occurred in 21% after 4 years and 29% after 7 years.  Treatment failures were slightly lower for those who had the single  procedure. The Journal of the American Medical Association published the  study. HealthDay News wrote about it May 14. 

<strong>What Is the Doctor's Reaction?</strong>
 It's a common problem that few women want to talk about: pelvic organ prolapse. 
  It develops when the tissues in the pelvis loosen. This may allow the  cervix, uterus and bladder to enter the vaginal canal near the entrance  to the vagina. This problem also goes by other names. They include  pelvic relaxation, cervical prolapse and uterine prolapse. 
  Pelvic organ prolapse is more common as women get older. The risk of  prolapse is also greater for women who are obese or have had several  vaginal births. 
 Symptoms include: 
<ul><li>Discomfort in the pelvis, lower abdomen or back</li><li>A bulging of pink tissue into the vagina</li><li>Bleeding from the vagina</li><li>Urinary problems, such as:<br /><ul><li>Frequent urination</li><li>Urinary tract infections</li><li>Leakage of urine during heavy lifting, coughing or sneezing (called stress urinary incontinence) </li></ul></li><li>Pain or urine leakage during sex</li></ul>
  Surgery is often needed to treat this condition. During the operation,  surgeons often insert a firm, synthetic material called &quot;surgical mesh.&quot;  The purpose is to hold the vagina and pelvic organs in place. (You may  have heard about problems with surgical mesh from advertisements by  malpractice attorneys. Problems linked to some types of surgical mesh  have led to recalls and lawsuits.) 
 Surgeons sometimes perform  another procedure at the same time. It's called urethropexy. The purpose  is to help prevent stress urinary incontinence. 
 More than  225,000 operations for pelvic organ prolapse are done each year in the  United States. Still, much about these procedures is uncertain. For  example: 
<ul><li>How effective is the standard operation (called abdominal sacrocolpopexy)? </li><li>How long do the benefits of surgery last? </li><li>How effective is urethropexy in preventing urinary incontinence? </li></ul>
 A new study attempts to answer these questions. 
  Study results appear this week in the Journal of the American Medical  Association. Researchers analyzed the long-term results of surgery for  women with pelvic organ prolapse. They found that after 7 years: 
<ul><li>Pelvic organ prolapse had returned in up to 27%.</li><li>Up to 29% of the women had a return of the symptoms that led to their surgery. </li><li>Most  of the women had stress urinary leakage. This included 62% of the women  who had urethropexy to prevent the problem and 77% of those who did not  have this surgery. </li><li>For about 10% of the women, the mesh used in the surgery fell to pieces over time. </li></ul>
  These findings are disappointing. The failure rate is unacceptably  high. It also appears to increase over time. The results suggest it's  better to have urethropexy as part of the operation for pelvic organ  prolapse. But even those who added this procedure had a high rate of  urinary leakage after seven years. 
 <strong>What Changes Can I Make Now?</strong>
 You may be able to reduce the chances you'll have symptoms of pelvic organ prolapse. Here's what you can do: 
<ul><li>Avoid heavy lifting. </li><li>Maintain a healthy weight. </li><li>Don't smoke. The chronic cough of many smokers is thought to contribute to some cases of pelvic organ prolapse. </li></ul>
  These measures may be particularly important if you are obese or have  had several vaginal births. If so, your risk of pelvic organ prolapse is  higher than average. 
 If you already have pelvic organ prolapse,  know your treatment options. Keep in mind that if you have no symptoms,  you may not need treatment. Other options include: 
<ul><li>Exercises to strengthen muscles of the pelvis -- These are often called Kegel exercises. </li><li>Insertion  of a pessary into the vagina -- This ring-shaped device provides  support to the cervix and uterus and helps keep them in place. </li><li>Surgery  -- This includes the type of operation described in this latest  research. However, other procedures also are done. They include  hysterectomy (removal of the uterus). The choice depends on your goals  and preferences. Things to consider include your symptoms, your age and  whether you want to have children in the future. </li></ul>
 Talk with  your surgeon if you've had surgery for pelvic organ prolapse and have  concerns about the success of your surgery or about a surgical mesh  recall. 
 <strong>What Can I Expect Looking to the Future?</strong>
  I hope that in the future we will have more effective procedures to  offer women with pelvic organ prolapse. This might include a new type of  surgical mesh, or it may be a completely different type of operation.  Effective ways to prevent the problem would be even better. 
  Regardless of how the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse changes in the  future, we'll need to study it. This research shows how important it is  to conduct long-term research on standard treatments, especially for  conditions that are as common and important as pelvic organ prolapse.]]></content:encoded>
			
			<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 14:14:00 -0400</pubDate>
			
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Processed, Restaurant Foods Still High-Sodium</title>
			<link>http://www.planforyourhealth.com/living-healthy/health-news/healthy-living/healthy-living-details/newsarticle/processed-restaurant-foods-still-high-sodium/</link>
			<description>The high sodium level of processed and restaurant foods is not  getting much better, two new...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[The high sodium level of processed and restaurant foods is not  getting much better, two new studies find. One study analyzed 685 meals  from 19 sit-down, chain restaurants. The average meal had 2,269  milligrams (mg) of sodium. Most adults shouldn't have any more than that  in an entire day, U.S. government guidelines say. The guidelines  recommend 2,300 mg a day or less for most people. Some groups are urged  to stay under 1,500 mg a day. They include people over 50 and African  Americans. People with high blood pressure, diabetes or kidney disease  also are advised to stick to the lower level. The average American now  consumes about 3,300 mg a day. Another new study found that recent  efforts to reduce sodium in processed and restaurant foods have been  &quot;inconsistent and slow.&quot; Researchers compared sodium levels in 402  processed foods from 2005 and 2011. The amounts fell by only about 3.5%.  In foods from 78 fast-food restaurants, average sodium rose by 2.6%.  Sodium levels in some foods dropped 30%. In other foods, levels rose  that much or more. The journal JAMA Internal Medicine published the  studies online. HealthDay News wrote about them May 13.  

<strong>What Is the Doctor's Reaction?</strong>
 Eat less sodium. Eat less sodium. Eat less sodium. The message is loud and clear. 
  You do need some sodium for your body to work properly. But Americans,  on average, eat about 3,400 milligrams (mg) of sodium per day. That's  more than double the recommended amounts for some adults. 
 For  most adults, the recommended daily sodium intake is less than 2,300 mg  per day (about 1 teaspoon of salt). The U.S. government recommends less  than 1,500 mg per day for adults over age 50 or those with certain  medical problems. The problems include high blood pressure and diabetes.  
 Why does sodium matter? There is a clear link between too much  sodium intake and high blood pressure. And high blood pressure greatly  increases the risk of heart disease and stroke. Nearly 75 million  Americans have high blood pressure. Many more are at risk of developing  it. 
 People develop high blood pressure for many reasons. But  eating too much sodium is a major contributor. Some of that sodium comes  from the salt we add to our foods. But by far the greater problem is  the amount of sodium already in the processed foods we commonly eat. We  do have control over the foods we choose to eat. However, we do not have  control over the amount of sodium in processed foods. 
 Companies and restaurants have been urged to reduce the sodium in their foods. But how good a job have they done? 
  It appears that not much has changed. A pair of research studies, out  this week, remind us just how much sodium is in processed foods and  restaurant meals. One study showed that the average single meal at a  sit-down restaurant contains 2,269 mg of sodium. That's almost as much  as the recommended sodium limit <em>for an entire day</em> for an average adult. 
  A second study looked at whether there have been any changes in how  much sodium is in processed foods we buy or in the restaurant foods we  order. The study looked at 402 processed foods and 78 fast-food  restaurant items. Some foods had lower sodium content. But overall there  had been no significant change when comparing average sodium content in  foods in 2005 to foods in 2011. 
 <strong>What Changes Can I Make Now?</strong>
  The first step is to try to limit how much sodium you are eating. You  have the power to choose what you eat. Here are some tips: 
<ol><li><strong>Pay attention to how much sodium is in the food you buy. </strong>  Check the labels. Make note of how many servings are in the package.  Most labels indicate how much sodium is in one serving. If you eat the  whole package, you need to multiply the amount of sodium by the number  of servings you have. It's much harder to know how much sodium is in a  restaurant meal. But many chain restaurants are now making the nutrition  information for their foods available. Take a look. You might be  shocked at what you find. </li><br /><li><strong>Cook your own food. </strong>  Much of the sodium in our diets comes from processed and pre-prepared  foods. If you make your food yourself, from fresh ingredients, you will  automatically cut down your sodium intake. Of course, this is hard,  especially in our fast-paced lives, but it's well worth the effort. </li><br /><li><strong>Don't be fooled by &quot;low fat&quot; or &quot;low cholesterol&quot; on the labels. </strong>  Some packages say &quot;low fat,&quot; some say &quot;low cholesterol&quot; and some say  &quot;low salt.&quot; But most foods don't have all of these in one. Remember that  a food that's good for you in one way may not be good for you in  another. Even those foods that are labeled as &quot;low salt&quot; may still have  more sodium than you need. Read the labels carefully. </li></ol>
 <strong>What Can I Expect Looking to the Future?</strong>
  There is no debate that Americans have too much sodium in their diets.  It is well-recognized that higher levels of dietary sodium intake are  linked to higher rates of heart disease and stroke. Yes, people do need  to take responsibility for the foods they eat. But the food industry  also needs to take responsibility by reducing the sodium in processed  foods. 
 It seems that allowing food manufacturers and restaurants  to voluntarily reduce sodium has not been successful. In the future,  the government may require companies and restaurants to lower sodium  levels in foods. 
 In the meantime, there is much we can do to  reduce the sodium we consume. We can pay attention to labels, focus on  eating fresh fruits and vegetables, and cook our own food. Otherwise, we  will see the consequences of our high-sodium diets in the next decades  with an increase in the rates of high blood pressure, heart disease and  stroke.]]></content:encoded>
			
			<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 14:09:00 -0400</pubDate>
			
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Doctors Urged to Screen for Alcohol Problems</title>
			<link>http://www.planforyourhealth.com/living-healthy/health-news/healthy-living/healthy-living-details/newsarticle/doctors-urged-to-screen-for-alcohol-problems/</link>
			<description> An influential group of experts is recommending that primary care  doctors screen all adults for...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[ An influential group of experts is recommending that primary care  doctors screen all adults for alcohol problems. The advice comes from  the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. This independent group reviews  medical evidence and offers advice to doctors on preventive care. The  new report says there's enough evidence to show that asking one question  can help show which patients may have &quot;risky&quot; drinking patterns. The  question is: &quot;How many times in the past year have you had five or more  drinks in a day (if you're a man), or four or more drinks (if you're a  woman or older than 65)?&quot; If the person says this has happened at least  once, the doctor can ask more questions to assess the degree of risk.  Risky drinking may be causing current problems or may just increase the  risk of problems later. The journal Annals of Internal Medicine  published the study. HealthDay News wrote about it May 13. 

<strong>What Is the Doctor's Reaction?</strong>
  There's so much to accomplish during a routine visit to your primary  care doctor. So having a simple screening tool to determine if a person  is misusing alcohol is terrific. 
 The one question: &quot;How many times in the past year have you had X or more drinks in a day?&quot; 
  X is 5 for men and 4 for women and all adults older than 65. If the  answer is at least once, then the doctor should do further questioning.  The person may be misusing alcohol. 
 The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force identifies the following levels of misuse: 
<ul><li>Risky  alcohol use: For men, more than 14 drinks per week or more than 4  drinks in one day. For women, more than 7 drinks per week or more than 3  drinks in one day. Risky means you are more likely to develop social or  medical problems related to alcohol. </li><li>Harmful alcohol use: Alcohol misuse has already impacted your physical or mental health or harmed your social relationships. </li><li>Alcohol abuse includes one or more of the following:<br /><ul><li>Multiple times you have not met your responsibilities at home, work or school</li><li>Excessive  alcohol use, followed by droving a vehicle, operating machinery or  doing something else that put you or others in harm's way</li><li>Legal problems related to alcohol use</li></ul></li><li>Alcohol dependence: Physical craving for alcohol and/or symptoms of alcohol withdrawal if you try to stop drinking</li></ul>
  Similar to all screening tests, this one-question test is not perfect.  It can identify about 85% of adults who misuse alcohol. So it is a  sensitive test. But about 30% of people who say that they have had more  than 4 or 5 drinks at least once in the last year do not have a problem  with alcohol. 
 <strong>What Changes Can I Make Now?</strong>
 The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force wants primary care doctors to screen patients for alcohol misuse. Here's why: 
<ul><li>The question appears to do no harm. It might make someone feel uncomfortable, but not much else. </li><li>Screening might identify a much more serious problem than the doctor has recognized or the patient has mentioned. </li><li>Early, simple interventions may prevent risky alcohol use from becoming harmful use or abuse. </li></ul>
  A little advice and encouragement may help you figure out if your  drinking follows a risky pattern and what to do about it. The source of  advice could be your primary care doctor. Or the doctor might refer you  to an alcoholism counselor. Often a non-professional person who is  knowledgeable about alcohol or had an alcohol problem can be very  effective. 
 This is not long-term therapy. It's perhaps two or  three discussions. The helper can ask you how much you are drinking and  let you know how it compares with the norm. He or she might: 
<ul><li>Talk briefly about the consequences of more serious alcohol use</li><li>Provide a self-help manual or workbook</li><li>Suggest that you keep records of your drinking and choose a goal of cutting back or stopping completely</li></ul>
 <strong>What Can I Expect Looking to the Future?</strong>
  You may see increased publicity about risky alcohol use. This has been  shown to be effective. In one study, people misusing alcohol were helped  by little more than responding to a public appeal. The advertisement  was placed in newspapers, on television, on radio and in leaflets and  posters distributed in Toronto, Canada. 
 The ad contained a  telephone number, along with the following message: &quot;Thinking of a  change in your drinking? Do you know that 75% of people change their  drinking on their own? Call us for materials that can be completed at  home.&quot;]]></content:encoded>
			
			<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 14:10:00 -0400</pubDate>
			
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Survey: Many Teens Text While Driving</title>
			<link>http://www.planforyourhealth.com/living-healthy/health-news/healthy-living/healthy-living-details/newsarticle/survey-many-teens-text-while-driving/</link>
			<description> Almost half of older U.S. teens text while driving, a new survey  shows. And those who text while...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Almost half of older U.S. teens text while driving, a new survey  shows. And those who text while driving are also more likely to do other  dangerous things. Researchers used results from a national survey on  youth behavior. They focused on answers given by 8,500 teens who were  age 16 or older. Nearly 45% said they had texted or e-mailed while  driving during the last 30 days. They were 5 times as likely to drive  after drinking alcohol as teens who didn't text while driving. About 25%  of the teens texted while driving every day. Teens in this group were  40% less likely to wear seat belts than teens who just texted while  driving once or twice in the last month. Older students and males were  the most likely to text while driving. The journal Pediatrics published  the study online. USA Today and HealthDay News wrote about it April 13.

<strong>What Is the Doctor's Reaction?</strong>
 OMG! LOL! G2G! TTYL! 
 Look familiar? 
  If you have a teenage son or daughter, you've probably seen this  texting shorthand before. Sometimes it seems as if teens have their very  own texting language. Texting can be a fun way for teens to keep in  touch with their friends. But they should never be texting while  driving! 
 Car crashes are the No. 1 killer of teenagers in the  United States. About 3,000 young lives are lost every year because of  car accidents. Most of these crashes are caused by driver inexperience.  When you add in distractions (such as texting), the result can be  especially deadly. 
 A new study published in the journal  Pediatrics looked at the rates of texting and driving among teens aged  16 years and older. The researchers used results from the Youth Risk  Behavior Survey. High school students across the country take this  survey. It asks them questions about their lifestyle, such as whether or  not they smoke cigarettes, drink alcohol or use drugs. 
 As part  of the survey, teens were also asked whether they had sent a text or  e-mail while driving during the last 30 days. In all, 8,505 students  answered this question. <em>Almost half</em> (45%) reported texting while driving in the last month. That is a lot of distracted drivers on the road! 
 The students who had sent texts while driving were also more likely to: 
<ul><li>Not always wear a seatbelt</li><li>Ride with a driver who had been drinking alcohol</li><li>Drink alcohol and drive</li></ul>
  These findings suggest that a large group of teens may act in unsafe  ways while driving. This is putting the teens themselves, their  passengers and other drivers at risk for crash-related injuries or even  death. 
 <strong>What Changes Can I Make Now?</strong>
 Experts  are brainstorming ways to decrease the number of teens who are texting  and driving. Here are some of their proposed strategies: 
<ul><li><strong>Bans on cell phone use (including texting) for new drivers</strong>.  Currently, 36 states and the District of Columbia have laws making it  illegal for new drivers to use their cell phones while behind the wheel.  Forty-five states, and Washington, D.C., have specifically banned  texting while driving for new drivers. Find out more about the <link http://www.ghsa.org/html/stateinfo/laws/cellphone_laws.html _blank first>laws in your state.</link> </li><br /><br /><li><strong>New technology</strong>.  Some experts have recommended installing devices that block cell phone  use in teens' cars. Others have recommended devices that monitor the  teen's driving behaviors (such as cell phone use). These devices provide  feedback to parents. </li><br /><br /><li><strong>Parental supervision</strong>.  Setting rules against cell phone use for your child is critically  important. Make sure they are following these rules, too. This may be  the best way to decrease texting and driving. </li></ul>
 Teen car  crashes can be prevented. Proven strategies can improve the safety of  young drivers on the road. Here are more things you can do to keep your  teen driver safe: 
<ul><li><strong>Practice driving with your teen</strong> as much as you can. The more experience he has behind the wheel, the safer he'll drive. </li><br /><br /><li><strong>Set rules for the road</strong>.  Make sure that your new driver (and her passengers) always wear seat  belts. Limit the hours when she is allowed to drive. Don't allow driving  at night or with teen passengers. Crashes are more likely to occur in  these situations. </li><br /><br /><li><strong>Limit distractions</strong>. Sending  texts, making phone calls, using a GPS or MP3 player all take a driver's  focus off the road. Instead, suggest other options to these bad habits.  For example, encourage your teen to pull into a parking lot to answer  or make phone calls. </li><br /><br /><li><strong>Write a parent-teen driving agreement</strong>. Work with your teen to write the agreement. Have him or her sign it!<br /><ul><li>Discuss your rules of the road with your teen. </li><li>Talk about why the rules must be followed. </li><li>Explain what the consequences are for breaking them. </li></ul></li><br /><li><strong>Lead by example</strong>.  Be a role model of good driving behaviors. Always do this, even when  your children are too young to drive. Young children can pick up on your  dangerous behaviors. If you talk on the phone, text, speed or drive  without your seat belt, teens will do what they see you do. </li></ul>
 The government's &quot;Parents are the Key&quot; campaign offers parents <link http://www.cdc.gov/ParentsAreTheKey/about/index.html _blank first>tools and proven steps</link> for reducing teen driving injuries and deaths. 
 <strong>What Can I Expect Looking to the Future?</strong>
  You can expect serious efforts to keep young drivers safe on the road.  Laws against cell phone use and texting will be strictly enforced.  States that do not have such laws may begin to pass them. 
 You  also can expect your child's pediatrician to stress the importance of  practicing safe driving behaviors. The doctor is very likely to  encourage you to set road safety rules for your teen. This should  include no cell phone use at all while driving.]]></content:encoded>
			
			<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 13:07:00 -0400</pubDate>
			
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Study Finds No Benefit from Fish Oil Pills</title>
			<link>http://www.planforyourhealth.com/living-healthy/health-news/healthy-living/healthy-living-details/newsarticle/study-finds-no-benefit-from-fish-oil-pills/</link>
			<description> Fish oil pills don't reduce the risk of heart attack and stroke in  people at high risk of heart...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Fish oil pills don't reduce the risk of heart attack and stroke in  people at high risk of heart disease, a new study suggests. Earlier  studies concluded that eating fatty fish, such as salmon and tuna, could  lower risk in people with heart failure or a previous heart attack. The  new study focused on about 12,500 people who never had a heart attack  or stroke. But they had high blood pressure, a family history of heart  disease or several other factors that increased their risk. They already  were taking medicines to address those risks. People were randomly  divided into 2 groups. One group took a daily capsule containing omega-3  fatty acids found in fish. The other group took placebo pills that  contained olive oil. In the next 5 years, about 12% of each group died  or spent time in a hospital because of a heart attack, stroke or other  heart-related problem. People who got the real fish oil did not have  better results. The New England Journal of Medicine published the study.  The Associated Press wrote about it May 9.

<strong>What Is the Doctor's Reaction?</strong>
  Fish oil has been flying high as a health-boosting supplement. It has  garnered a reputation as an easy way to protect the heart, improve brain  function and lengthen life. 
 Such claims are one reason that  Americans spend more than $1 billion a year on over-the-counter fish  oil. Food companies also are adding it to milk, yogurt, cereal,  chocolate, cookies, juice and many other foods. 
 Fish oil is loaded with omega-3 (or n-3) fatty acids. There are three main types: 
<ul><li>Eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) </li><li>Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) </li><li>Alpha-linolenic acid (ALA) </li></ul>
  EPA and DHA are found mainly in fish. For that reason, they are  sometimes called marine omega-3s. ALA is found in plant-based foods,  such as flaxseed, walnuts, and canola and soybean oils. 
 It's  true that healthy people tend to have high levels of EPA and DHA in  their blood. People with heart failure, stroke and heart attack often  have lower levels of these omega-3 fatty acids. However, this does not  necessarily mean that taking fish oil pills will prevent heart disease. 
 In fact, there is now good evidence that you do <em>not</em>  decrease your chance of heart attack, stroke or death by taking fish  oil pills. Based on the results of a new study, even people at high risk  of heart attack, stroke or premature death showed no benefit. Study  results appear in today's New England Journal of Medicine. 
 All  of the people enrolled in the study had known blood vessel disease or  had multiple factors that put them at high risk. They had at least four  of the following risk factors, or they had diabetes and at least one of  these factors: 
<ul><li>Age 65 or older</li><li>Male sex</li><li>High blood pressure</li><li>High cholesterol</li><li>Current smoker</li><li>Obesity</li><li>A  family history of coronary artery disease at a younger age (father or  brother younger than 55, mother or sister younger than 65) </li></ul>
  People in the study were randomly assigned to take capsules containing  either olive oil or omega-3 fatty acids. Results for the two groups were  the same. The omega-3 capsules did not prevent death or hospital stays  for heart attack or stroke. 
 Side effects were also measured  during the study. Minor side effects were similar in both groups. People  reported no major side effects. 
 <strong>What Changes Can I Make Now?</strong>
  To help prevent heart disease and lower your risk of heart attack and  stroke, don't rely on omega-3 fatty acid pills. But do keep eating fish,  especially fatty fish that are rich in omega-3 fatty acids. Examples of  fatty fish include salmon, sardines, mackerel, char and halibut. 
  Why the fish but not fish oil pills? Multiple well-done studies have  shown that fish eaters have lower rates of heart disease and stroke.  True, that doesn't prove that the fish directly causes the lower risk.  But fish is one of the healthiest sources of protein. 
 Also, stick to the proven ways to lower your chance of heart attack and stroke: 
<ul><li>Quit smoking. </li><li>Exercise more. </li><li>Eat smaller portions of food and decrease saturated fat. </li><li>Keep your blood pressure in the normal range, with medicines if needed. </li><li>Know your LDL cholesterol level. Lower it with a statin or other medicine if needed. </li><li>Talk with your doctor about whether you should take a baby aspirin. </li></ul>
  You might still decide to take fish oil pills or another type of  omega-3 supplement. At low to moderate doses, this appears to be quite  safe. I suggest taking no more than 1,000 milligrams (one gram) of  fish-oil based omega-3s per day. 
 For people with very high blood  triglyceride levels, high-dose omega-3 pills are an effective  treatment. These pills (known as Lovaza) are available by prescription.  The usual dose is 4 grams per day. 
 <strong>What Can I Expect Looking to the Future?</strong>
  As we have seen with other supplements, such as vitamin E, the  scientific evidence supporting health benefits from fish oil does not  live up to the hype. Is this the final word on omega-3s? Probably not.]]></content:encoded>
			
			<pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 14:12:00 -0400</pubDate>
			
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Christie Gets Surgery to Aid Weight Loss</title>
			<link>http://www.planforyourhealth.com/living-healthy/health-news/diet-fitness/diet-fitness-details/newsarticle/christie-gets-surgery-to-aid-weight-loss/</link>
			<description> New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, who has endured both jokes and  doubts about his political future...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[ New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, who has endured both jokes and  doubts about his political future because of obesity, says that he has  had weight-loss surgery. Christie told the New York Post that he had a  gastric banding procedure February 16. This surgery involves placing an  adjustable band around the stomach to make it smaller. It makes people  feel full faster. This and related procedures are the favored option for  very obese people who have not lost weight in other ways. Christie, 50,  did not announce that he had the procedure. He answered questions  raised by the newspaper. Some commentators have said that health  concerns could limit Christie's political future. He has been mentioned  often as a potential Republican candidate for president. But Christie  told the Post that he got the procedure for the sake of his family, not  politics. Christie has never revealed his weight. But he has said that  he tried several programs for weight loss. Each time, he gained the  weight back. Christie would not say how much he has lost since the  procedure. The Associated Press, the New York Times and others reported  on the story May 7. 

<strong>What Is the Doctor's Reaction?</strong>
 Weight-loss surgery has been hailed as a potential lifesaver for people who are severely overweight. It can dramatically: 
<ul><li>Reduce blood sugar levels</li><li>Lower blood pressure and cholesterol</li><li>Improve sleep apnea (a dangerous pattern of breath holding during sleep) </li><li>Improve heart function</li></ul>
  In general, weight-loss surgery is intended for people with a body mass  index (BMI) of 40 or higher. They are considered to be very obese.  People with a BMI of 35 to 39.9 also may qualify for surgery. They must  also have a severe, treatment-resistant medical condition. Such  conditions include diabetes, heart problems and sleep apnea. 
  Some experts suggest that some people with type 2 diabetes and even  lower BMI levels (between 30 and 34.9) be considered for surgery. 
  Whether Governor Christie had weight loss surgery for political reasons  or for concerns about his future health, he clearly fits the profile of  a good candidate. We don't know his exact weight before surgery.  However, the estimate is 300 pounds plus. He is just under 6 feet tall.  This gives him a body mass index of at least 41. 
 Christie also  admits to multiple trials in weight-loss programs. He has lost and  regained substantial amounts of weight at least a couple of times. But,  like more than 95% of obese people, he has regained all the lost pounds  and more. 
 The governor has said he was otherwise in good health.  Even if that was correct, his risk of developing problems directly  related to obesity was high. At a BMI of greater than 40 and knowing  that the surgery appeared uncomplicated for him, Christie surely chose  the best and perhaps only treatment option for obesity. 
 <strong>What Changes Can I Make Now?</strong>
 Today, surgeons generally suggest one of three weight-loss procedures: 
<ul><li><strong>Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding</strong>  -- This is the simplest of the three procedures. It is done through  small holes in the abdomen. The surgeon wraps an adjustable band around  the upper stomach. This creates a small pouch with a narrow opening that  empties into the rest of the stomach. The person feels full much sooner  than before. </li><li><strong>Open Roux-en-Y gastric bypass</strong> -- The  surgeon cuts into the abdomen and creates a small pouch in the stomach.  This bypasses the rest of the stomach. The pouch is hooked to a loop of  small intestine beyond the first section of intestine. </li><li><strong>Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass</strong>  -- There's no large surgical cut. Small holes are made in the abdomen.  Cameras are used to guide the instruments. The technique is otherwise  similar to the open Roux-en-Y. </li></ul>
 Governor Christie opted for  the simplest procedure, the stomach banding. For most, this is same-day  surgery. Christie's surgery was reported to take only 40 minutes, and  he was home later the same day. Recovery moves along quickly. 
  Christie will check in with his weight-loss surgeon regularly to see if  the stomach band needs adjusting. The band can be easily tightened or  loosened as needed depending on his rate of desired weight loss and how  he feels. Usually weight loss should be slow and steady. He must be sure  to get enough vitamins and minerals through diet, supplements or both. 
  Roux-en-Y surgery leads to greater average weight loss than gastric  banding. However, it is a more complicated operation. It also has  greater short-term and long-term risks. 
 <strong>What Can I Expect Looking to the Future?</strong>
  If you are considering weight-loss surgery, realize that you must  commit to a lifelong change in the way you eat. Without lifestyle  change, surgery will either make you miserable or not result in weight  loss. And likely both. This is why people are required to go through at  least one structured weight-loss program before they are eligible for  surgery.]]></content:encoded>
			
			<pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 14:23:00 -0400</pubDate>
			
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Seeking a Better Way to Fight Eye Disease</title>
			<link>http://www.planforyourhealth.com/living-healthy/health-news/conditions/health-conditions-details/newsarticle/seeking-a-better-way-to-fight-eye-disease/</link>
			<description> Adding components found in fish oil doesn't improve a pill that may  help to slow down a blinding...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Adding components found in fish oil doesn't improve a pill that may  help to slow down a blinding eye disease. But a new study found  potential benefit in tweaking the pills' contents in other ways. The  study included about 1,600 people. All had macular degeneration in at  least one eye. A supplement containing vitamins C and E, beta-carotene,  copper and zinc has been shown to slow how rapidly the disease gets  worse. The new study assigned people to receive those pills plus one of  four other pills. They contained the vegetable pigments lutein and  zeaxanthin, the omega-3 fatty acids DHA and EPA, all four, or none of  the four (placebo). Overall, none of these extra pills helped to slow  the disease. But some people received the original formula pill in a  version that left out beta-carotene. People who got this version of the  original formula seemed to gain benefit from taking lutein and  zeaxanthin. Leaving out beta-carotene did not reduce the benefit of the  original pills for anyone. Beta-carotene may increase lung cancer risk  in smokers. The authors said more research is needed. The Journal of the  American Medical Association published the study online. USA Today  wrote about it May 6. 

<strong>What Is the Doctor's Reaction?</strong>
  Macular degeneration runs in my family. One of my elderly aunts was  blind before she died. My grandfather struggled with his vision. It was  harder for him to be unable to see well than it was for him to be  terribly limited by a heart condition. He couldn't move easily, and his  vision restricted him further from exploring the world through reading,  watching TV or driving. 
 Macular degeneration is an eye condition  that affects our central visual area, called the macula. It's also  called age-related macular degeneration or AMD. People with macular  degeneration gradually lose their vision right in the middle of their  eyes. They find that they cannot see well straight ahead and cannot see  fine details. 
 Severely affected people can't drive, read or do  crafts. AMD is the cause of half of the blindness in the United States.  It is the leading cause of blindness in the developed world. 
 Wet  and dry macular degeneration are the two types of this disease. The wet  kind gets worse faster than the dry kind does. The dry kind is more  common. There are some experimental treatments for wet AMD, but no good  treatments for dry AMD. However, a specific combination of vitamins,  discussed below, may help to slow down the disease. 
 This latest  news relates to a study called the Age Related Eye Disease Study, or  AREDS. Previous research based on this study has found that certain  vitamins and minerals may help prevent macular degeneration from  developing or getting worse. They include vitamins C and E,  beta-carotene, zinc and copper. 
 The new study added different  combinations of supplements to the original formula of proven vitamins.  Researchers wanted to see if other supplements would be of further  benefit. They tested four groups. All four received the original  formula. 
<ul><li>One group also got lutein and zeaxanthin. These  are plant-derived antioxidants. Lutein is found in leafy green  vegetables like kale and spinach. Zeaxanthin is related to vitamin A. It  is responsible for the colors of paprika, corn and saffron. </li><li>A second group also got DHA and EPA, omega-3 fatty acids found in fish oils. </li><li>A third group also got lutein, zeaxanthin, DHA and EPA. </li><li>People in the fourth group got no extra supplements. They took placebo (fake) pills. </li></ul>
 The study, unfortunately, found that none of the extra supplements further delayed or decreased vision loss. 
  Some people received the original formula without beta-carotene, which  has been linked with higher lung cancer risk in smokers. The formula  appeared to be just as effective without it. 
 Based on their  analysis, the authors hope that looking further at the lutein and  zeaxanthin groups will lead to a role for these supplements. In these  small groups, people who received the original formula without  beta-carotene did better than those whose pills included it. People who  had very low levels of lutein and zeaxanthin in their diets also did  better with these supplements than those who got more from their diets. 
 
 <strong>What Changes Can I Make Now?</strong>
  Macular degeneration is more common in smokers, whites and people who  have a family history of the condition. If you are over 50 and in a  high-risk group, it's reasonable to see an eye doctor for an exam. At  this age, it is also a good idea to be checked for other eye diseases,  such as glaucoma or cataracts. If you have diabetes, you should see an  eye doctor every year. 
 Don't wait until you have trouble with  your vision. At this point, we cannot restore vision, so preventing any  loss is key to maintaining your eyesight. 
 If your doctor  recommends it, you might consider taking the AREDS vitamin preparation.  It works best for certain groups of people, so definitely talk to a  doctor before deciding to take these supplements. Also, be sure to eat  your leafy green veggies. 
 If you are already having problems  with your vision, don't despair and don't delay. Your eye doctor can  help you find a low-vision specialist and some visual rehabilitation.  These steps can help you make the best of what you have and continue to  enjoy a rich, full life. 
 <strong>What Can I Expect Looking to the Future?</strong>
  This work really shows the benefit of large research studies. These  studies are able to answer complicated questions and point us in good  directions for future learning. Great strides have been made in macular  degeneration during the last several years. I hope they will continue in  both treatment and prevention.]]></content:encoded>
			
			<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
			
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Most Parents Report Distracted Driving</title>
			<link>http://www.planforyourhealth.com/living-healthy/health-news/healthy-living/healthy-living-details/newsarticle/most-parents-report-distracted-driving/</link>
			<description> In a new survey, nearly 90% of parents admitted to being distracted  by technology in the last...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[ In a new survey, nearly 90% of parents admitted to being distracted  by technology in the last month while driving with their kids. The  activities ranged from talking on the phone or texting to fiddling with  the GPS or DVD player. And there were old-style distractions, too, such  as eating or picking up a toy. The top distraction was phone calls.  Nearly 75% of parents talked on the phone while driving. About 600  parents took part in the survey. They answered questions while their  children were being treated for a variety of reasons in an emergency  room. The children's ages ranged from 1 through 12. About 70% said they  did something related to child care while driving. Examples included  feeding the child or picking up a toy. Nearly as many reported  self-care, such as eating or grooming. About half were distracted by  seeking directions on a GPS or map. Similar numbers did something  related to entertainment, such as changing a DVD. About 15% reported  texting while driving. Parents who reported distractions were also more  likely to have been in a car accident at some point. The study was  presented at a conference. HealthDay News wrote about it May 6.

<strong>What Is the Doctor's Reaction?</strong>
  When we think of distracted drivers, we tend to think about teenagers,  or those erratic drivers in front of us who don't use their turn signals  because they are holding their phones. We don't necessarily think about  … parents. 
 But, it turns out, parents can be very distracted  drivers. In a study just released, researchers from Michigan did a  survey of more than 600 adults. All were parents and caregivers of  children ages 1 through 12 who were seen in an emergency room for any  reason. 
 Researchers asked the parents how often in the last  month they had performed certain distracting activities while driving  with their child in the car. Here are the rough percentages that  reported doing each of these activities: 
<ul><li>Phone calls (handheld or hands-free): 75% </li><li>Child care (feeding, picking up a dropped toy): 70%</li><li>Self-care (grooming, eating): 70%</li><li>Directions (checking navigation system or map): 50%</li><li>Entertainment (changing CD or DVD): 50%</li><li>Texting: 15%</li></ul>
 Almost 90% said they had engaged in at least one technology-based distraction in the last month. 
  These activities are not all equally dangerous. Munching on a pretzel  or listening to your GPS system tell you to turn right is absolutely not  as dangerous as texting or leaning back to grab a dropped toy. 
  But we know that distractions can lead to accidents. Among these  parents, people who used a phone or did self-care while driving were  more than twice as likely to have ever been in a motor vehicle crash.  Those who did child care or got directions were just under twice as  likely. Drivers who had ever been in a crash were more likely to report  some sort of distracted driving than drivers never involved in a crash. 
  Another interesting finding was that parents whose children were not  restrained in the car properly (according to Michigan law) more often  reported child care distractions or texting. 
 <strong>What Changes Can I Make Now?</strong>
  All passengers are precious cargo, but children are especially  precious. They count on parents and caregivers to keep them safe. 
  Distractions cause accidents. We talk a lot about cell phones, but  anything can do it. You could be changing a radio station, or just  turning to talk to the person next to you. Anything that takes your eyes  and concentration off the road can lead to a crash. It's crucial that  parents and caregivers understand this. 
 It's hard not to have any distractions. But you can limit them. Here are a few things you can do: 
<ul><li>It's best to pull over to make a phone call. If you have to make a call while driving, use a hands-free device. </li><li>If snacks or toys are needed for a ride, do some planning to make sure they are within your children's reach. </li><li>Make  rules for the car. Let your kids know that you simply aren't going to  fix the DVD or change the music or reach back to get something while you  are driving. Then they'll be less likely to get upset and you'll be  less likely to be tempted to break your rules. Don't try to explain it  to them while you're in the car. Talk about it ahead of time. </li><li>Whenever possible, have another adult (or at least an older child) with you when taking long car trips with children. </li><li>Resist  the temptation to do a drive-thru for meals. Stop and eat. Between  eating yourself and reaching back to grab or give food, you are putting  everyone at risk. </li><li>Know where you are going ahead of time. This  helps avoid the distraction of figuring it out on a map or your smart  phone while driving. If you need to use a GPS system, use one that tells  you what to do, as opposed to one that you need to look at. If you do  need to look at it, mount it on the dashboard to minimize the amount of  time your eyes are off the road. </li></ul>
 <strong>What Can I Expect Looking to the Future?</strong>
  If we don't work to limit distractions, what we can expect is more  motor vehicle accidents. I hope that this study will be a wake-up call  -- and will help save lives.]]></content:encoded>
			
			<pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
			
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>FDA Probes Wider Caffeine Use in Food</title>
			<link>http://www.planforyourhealth.com/living-healthy/health-news/healthy-living/healthy-living-details/newsarticle/fda-probes-wider-caffeine-use-in-food/</link>
			<description> Caffeine has been showing up recently in snack foods, candy and gum.  Now U.S. food regulators are...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Caffeine has been showing up recently in snack foods, candy and gum.  Now U.S. food regulators are taking an interest. The Food and Drug  Administration (FDA) says it will look at the effects of caffeinated  foods on children's health and take action if necessary. The Associated  Press wrote about it April 30. The announcement came in response to a  new product that went on the market this week, Wrigley's Alert Energy  Gum. The agency already is investigating the use of caffeine in energy  drinks and energy shots. The FDA has given specific approval to the use  of caffeine in a food or drink only once, for colas. That decision was  in the 1950s. An official said the recent expansion of caffeine use in  foods is &quot;disturbing&quot; and &quot;beyond anything FDA envisioned.&quot; Other recent  products that contain caffeine include Jelly Belly Extreme Sport Beans,  snacks from ARMA Energy and Frito-Lay's Cracker Jack'd Power Bites.  Labels say the products are for adult use only. But critics say they  could be attractive to children as well.

<strong>What Is the Doctor's Reaction?</strong>
 <em>Hi doctor, <br /><br />  I'll make it short. Could you please let me know if anything in this  supplement might be harmful to me? I don't use it for weight loss but  just something to help me with more energy. <br /><br /> Thanks for your advice in this matter. </em>
  I am a primary care doctor. I get questions from patients all the time  about supplements, energy drinks, diet pills and herbal mixtures that  have been advertised. This was a message I got last week. 
 Many  of these &quot;energy boosters&quot; have caffeine as their active ingredient.  That was true for the supplement my patient was asking me about in this  message. Each pill had the amount of caffeine that you would get from  two cups of coffee. 
 Caffeine boosters and snacks are in the news  right now. This week, Wrigley started selling a caffeinated gum,  calling it &quot;the right energy, right now.&quot; 
 Food manufacturers  have also recently put caffeine into candy, chocolates, jelly beans,  trail mix, chips and other snack foods. 
 Some people are getting  more caffeine through these energy snacks than they ever got from  coffee. They are being marketed as a wellness product -- for more  energy, better athletic performance. So are caffeinated snacks safe? 
 In moderation, they are probably not going to do harm. 
  However, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) received 92 reports in 4  years about illnesses, hospital stays and deaths that came after people  drank an energy drink named 5-Hour Energy. The FDA has also received  reports of several deaths possibly linked to Monster Energy Drink. These  reports do not prove that the caffeinated drinks actually caused the  deaths. 
 Caffeine has its effect in the body by triggering the  brain to make extra adrenaline-type hormones. This can stress the heart  and raise blood pressure. 
 <strong>What Changes Can I Make Now?</strong>
  Caffeine is not a problem in the early part of the day, and in small  amounts. But it is good for you to know the side effects of regular,  heavy use of caffeine. If you want more energy, the healthiest way to  get that is by exercising and by getting enough sleep, not by using  caffeine: 
<ul><li>Caffeine may be linked to an increased heart  attack risk. Researchers focused on people with slow caffeine  metabolism. This means that caffeine stays in their bodies for a long  time. Among this subgroup, heart attacks were more likely to occur in  heavy coffee drinkers. Drinking 2 to 3 cups of coffee each day seemed to  be linked with a 36% increase in heart attack risk. With 4 or more cups  each day, the increase appeared to be 64%. This study was not designed  in a way that would tell us for sure that there is risk from caffeine. </li><br /><br /><li>Unfiltered  coffee might ever-so-slightly increase your total cholesterol levels.  Drinking 6 cups of unfiltered coffee (such as espresso) daily appears to  increase total cholesterol by about 12 milligrams per deciliter. This  small change is not much to be concerned about. </li><br /><br /><li>Heavy  coffee intake might change your blood level of homocysteine. This is a  substance that has been linked with heart risk. In one study, people who  drank 6 cups of coffee daily had a higher level of homocysteine than  people who drank no coffee. </li><br /><br /><li>Drinking 3 or more cups per day is linked with a higher risk of miscarriage in early pregnancy. </li><br /><br /><li>Caffeine can thin your bones. It causes some calcium to filter out of the body through your kidneys. </li><br /><br /><li>For  some people, caffeine causes headaches. This is a common symptom of  caffeine withdrawal. Other withdrawal symptoms are fatigue, foggy  thinking and an irritated mood. </li><br /><br /><li>Caffeine reliably causes insomnia. This is true for caffeine consumed as early in the day as noon. </li><br /><br /><li>Coffee or tea with meals can make you absorb less iron from the foods you eat. </li><br /><br /><li>Caffeine can cause anxiety symptoms. </li></ul>
 But there is good news, too. 
<ul><li>Some cancers seem to grow less if you consume caffeine. </li><li>Caffeine can stimulate a bowel movement. Morning coffee helps people to stay &quot;regular.&quot; </li><li>Sometimes, caffeine can take away a migraine headache. </li><li>Caffeine is linked with a slightly lower diabetes risk. </li></ul>
 <strong>What Can I Expect Looking to the Future?</strong>
  The Nurses' Health Study and the Physicians' Health Study each included  tens of thousands of people. These studies showed no difference in  diabetes or heart risk even for people drinking five cups of coffee per  day. That is very reassuring about caffeine as a safe product. 
  But now caffeine is being packaged in a way it can be just popped into  your mouth. So it is possible to get a much bigger dose of caffeine at  one time. The FDA is talking about restricting whether ads for  caffeinated products may target children. 
 Mostly, caffeine seems  safe in moderate quantities. But we don't yet understand a &quot;latte&quot;  about the full spectrum of risks or hazards of caffeine. ]]></content:encoded>
			
			<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 00:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
			
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Study: No Z-Pak Heart Risk for Most Adults</title>
			<link>http://www.planforyourhealth.com/living-healthy/health-news/healthy-living/healthy-living-details/newsarticle/study-no-z-pak-heart-risk-for-most-adults/</link>
			<description> A common antibiotic does not increase the risk of  heart-related death for young and middle-aged...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="body"> A common antibiotic does not increase the risk of  heart-related death for young and middle-aged adults without heart  problems, a new study finds. Earlier research found an increased risk  among people with heart disease who took azithromycin. This drug is also  known by the brand names Zithromax or Z-Pak. The new study looked at  1.1 million people who took azithromycin for infections. They were  compared with 1.1 million who did not take antibiotics and 7 million who  took penicillin V. Patients were ages 18 through 64. People were 3  times as likely to die of heart disease or stroke while taking either  antibiotic. Death rates were similar for both drugs. Researchers said  the higher risk appeared to be related to the infection rather than to  the treatment. The U.S. label for azithromycin and antibiotics similar  to it carries a warning. It says they could increase the risk of a heart  rhythm problem that can lead to death. The warning says this is more  likely in people with existing heart problems. The New England Journal  of Medicine published the study. HealthDay News wrote about it May 1. 

<strong>What Is the Doctor's Reaction?</strong>
  Did you ever take a &quot;Z-Pak&quot;? It's a common and convenient antibiotic  treatment. The drug is most commonly prescribed for respiratory  infections. 
 Z-Paks contain azithromycin. The brand name is  Zithromax, which is where the &quot;Z&quot; comes from. This is an antibiotic in  the same family as erythromycin. In recent years, you may have seen news  stories suggesting that taking azithromycin comes with a serious risk:  sudden cardiac (heart-related) death. 
 It's true. A study  published last year found a small but real increased risk of sudden  cardiac death among those taking azithromycin. They were compared with  people taking a penicillin-type antibiotic. 
 But before you swear  off azithromycin forever, consider this: The study analyzed adults  insured by Medicaid. That's important because this population includes  people who tend to have multiple medical problems (including heart  disease) and a high death rate in the first place. 
 What about  people whose hearts are healthy? Does the risk of sudden death after  taking azithromycin apply to them as well? That's where a new study  comes in. 
 The New England Journal of Medicine published the new  study. Researchers looked at the rate of heart- and stroke-related death  among more than a million people from the general population who took  azithromycin. Their ages were 18 through 64. They were compared with a  similar number who took no antibiotic. Azithromycin users also were  compared with more than 7 million people who took penicillin. 
 The results were reassuring: 
<ul><li>The  risk of heart- and stroke-related death among people taking  azithromycin was similar to that among people taking penicillin. </li><li>Compared  with people taking no antibiotic, the risk of heart- and stroke-related  death was nearly 3 times higher among people taking azithromycin.  However, after statistical analysis, this increase appeared to be  related to the infection or other health problems. It was not linked  with the antibiotic. </li><li>The number of heart- and stroke-related  deaths occurring during azithromycin use in this study was quite low.  The researchers estimate that, at most, 11 extra deaths might occur for  every 1 million courses of treatment. </li></ul>
 This study should provide a measure of comfort to the average person who gets a prescription for azithromycin. 
  Of course, no medicine is completely risk-free. Allergic reactions and  side effects (such as diarrhea) are relatively common with azithromycin  use. People with heart problems might be better off taking a different  antibiotic, if they need one. Still, this new study suggests that  azithromycin seems to be safe for the heart for most people. 
 <strong>What Changes Can I Make Now?</strong>
  Azithromycin can cause serious side effects. That risk is quite small,  but it serves as yet another reminder that we should take antibiotics  only when we truly need them. Remember that respiratory infections are  often caused by viruses, not bacteria. This is especially likely for  infections that cause sore throats, runny nose or cough. Antibiotics  don't kill viruses. 
 If you have heart disease, think twice  before taking azithromycin. If your doctor prescribes it, ask whether  you're at increased risk for heart rhythm problems. The doctor may  decide to prescribe a different antibiotic. 
 But, if you don't have heart problems, azithromycin is probably as safe as (or even safer than) other antibiotics. 
  Perhaps the most important changes to make are those that lower your  risk of respiratory infection. That means there's less chance you would  even need azithromycin in the first place. For example: 
<ul><li>Avoid contact with people who are sick. </li><li>Wash  your hands often, especially if you're around someone with an  infection. Remind infected people to wash their hands as well and to  cover the nose and mouth when coughing or sneezing. </li><li>Don't smoke. </li><li>Get  the flu shot each year. You'll be less likely to get the flu. That also  means you'll reduce your chances of receiving an antibiotic. Sometimes  that happens if there's concern that a bacterial infection might be  causing your flu symptoms. </li><li>Get the pneumococcus vaccination (often called &quot;the pneumonia vaccine&quot;). </li></ul>
 <strong>What Can I Expect Looking to the Future?</strong>
  In the future, we are likely to have new antibiotics. Then we won't  need to rely on azithromycin as much as we do now. New antibiotics are  likely to have side effects of their own. But I hope that sudden cardiac  death won't be among them! 
 More research should provide a  better understanding of who is at risk of heart and blood vessel  problems while taking azithromycin. Fortunately, it appears the average  young or middle-aged adult is not among them. </div>]]></content:encoded>
			
			<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 14:05:00 -0400</pubDate>
			
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Not Calling 911 Slows Stroke Treatment</title>
			<link>http://www.planforyourhealth.com/living-healthy/health-news/healthy-living/healthy-living-details/newsarticle/not-calling-911-slows-stroke-treatment/</link>
			<description> More than one-third of people having a stroke in the United States  don't call 911, a study shows....</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[ More than one-third of people having a stroke in the United States  don't call 911, a study shows. And that can make a big difference in  their treatment. The most effective treatment for ischemic stroke, the  most common type, is use of clot-busting drugs. But they work best when  given within 3 hours of the start of symptoms. In the new study, people  who called 911 arrived faster than those who got to the hospital on  their own. They also got treatment faster. The study looked at treatment  of about 200,000 stroke patients from 2003 to 2010. Not everyone is  eligible to get clot-busting drugs. Among those who were, 67% of those  who came by ambulance got the drugs within 3 hours of when their  symptoms started. Only 44% of those who got to the hospital on their own  met that timetable. About 79% of those who got to the hospital within 2  hours of the start of symptoms came by ambulance. So did 61% of those  who arrived within 3 hours. The journal Circulation: Cardiovascular  Quality and Outcomes published the study. HealthDay News wrote about it  April 30.

<strong>What Is the Doctor's Reaction?</strong>
  Many people don't realize that stroke is the fourth largest cause of  death in the United States. A stroke occurs when a part of the brain  does not receive enough oxygen or nutrients. The cause is either a  blocked blood vessel or a burst blood vessel in the brain. 
  People who survive a stroke can be left with major physical and mental  limitations that can be life-changing. Early treatment of stroke can be  life-saving and can limit the chance of having long-term disability.  Unfortunately, many people do not get to the hospital quickly. 
  Calling an ambulance is the first step to getting the fastest treatment.  A new research study reminds us that too few people having a stroke  call an ambulance. 
 Researchers studied more than 200,000 stroke  patients from more than 1,500 U.S. hospitals. These hospitals were  evaluating a program called &quot;Get With The Guidelines.&quot; This is an effort  by the American Heart Association and the American Stroke Association  to improve stroke and heart attack care. The program promotes use of set  treatment plans that are based on the latest research. 
 Hospitals record certain measurements of care. For stroke care, they include: 
<ul><li>Time it takes from the start of stroke symptoms to hospital arrival and the start of treatment </li><li>Number of people treated with clot-busting medicines </li><li>The severity of stroke</li><li>Number of patients who get education about stopping smoking and controlling blood pressure and cholesterol levels</li></ul>
  These are just a few examples of the many measures that are included.  The researchers in this study found that one measure in particular was  worrisome. Too few people called an ambulance when they were having a  stroke. 
 In fact, one-third of those who had stroke symptoms did  not call emergency medical services. Instead, they got to the hospital  on their own. This was more likely in rural areas and for minorities. 
  Here's why this matters. Clot-busting medicines can save lives and  reduce disability. But they can only be given within a three-hour window  from the start of symptoms. The longer it takes to get to the hospital,  the less likely you are to get these life-saving medicines. 
  Taking an ambulance gets your treatment started much faster. Why?  Emergency medical teams can give you medicines you need right away in  the ambulance. They also know which hospitals are set up to take care of  people who are having a stroke. This means you will get to the right  hospital right away. You'll also be more likely to get the most  appropriate treatments. 
 <strong>What Changes Can I Make Now?</strong>
  First, you have to know the symptoms of a stroke and remember to get  help fast. A good way to remember these tips is the mnemonic F-A-S-T. 
 <strong> F -- Face drooping or face numbness</strong>. If your smile is not equal on both sides, that may be a sign of a problem. 
 <strong> A -- Arm or leg weakness</strong>. Does one arm not work as well as the other? 
 <strong> S -- Speech problems</strong>. Are you having trouble speaking, or finding the right words, or even speaking gibberish? 
 <strong> T -- Time is of the essence. Call 9-1-1</strong>. As mentioned above, an ambulance can get someone to hospital and to life-saving treatments fast. 
 Other symptoms might signal a stroke as well. They include: 
<ul><li>Sudden confusion</li><li>Sudden vision loss</li><li>Sudden balance troubles</li></ul>
 It's also important to remember the factors that increase your risk of stroke. They include: 
<ul><li>High blood pressure</li><li>Atrial fibrillation (an abnormal heart rhythm) </li><li>Diabetes</li><li>Smoking</li><li>High cholesterol</li><li>Obesity</li><li>Lack of exercise</li></ul>
 <strong>What Can I Expect Looking to the Future?</strong>
  About 800,000 people have strokes each year in the United States. It is  clear that the faster you get the treated for stroke, the better off  you will be. I hope that better awareness about stroke symptoms of  stroke and the need to get treated quickly will reduce the number of  people with major limitations after having a stroke. 
 Programs  like &quot;Get With The Guidelines&quot; will continue to help us understand the  things we do well and the things we could do better with stroke care.  Picking up the phone and calling 9-1-1 with any possible stroke symptoms  is one way that we could all do better.]]></content:encoded>
			
			<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 14:09:00 -0400</pubDate>
			
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Antidepressants and Surgical Bleeding</title>
			<link>http://www.planforyourhealth.com/living-healthy/health-news/healthy-living/healthy-living-details/newsarticle/antidepressants-and-surgical-bleeding/</link>
			<description> People who take medicines for depression may have an increased risk  of bleeding with major...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[ People who take medicines for depression may have an increased risk  of bleeding with major surgery, a new study suggests. Researchers looked  at medical records for about 500,000 Americans who had surgery in a  2-year period. People who took drugs known as SSRIs were 10% more likely  to have excess bleeding after surgery than other patients. SSRI stands  for selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor. These drugs are  antidepressants. They include fluoxetine (Prozac), paroxetine (Paxil)  and many others. People who took SSRIs also had a higher risk of dying  in the hospital or being admitted again in the next month. This study  does not show that the drugs caused the problems. Researchers said that  people taking drugs for depression might have a higher risk of problems  with surgery for other reasons, too. The journal JAMA Internal Medicine  published the study. HealthDay News wrote about it April 29. 

<strong>What Is the Doctor's Reaction?</strong>
  About 10% of Americans take an antidepressant drug. For the great  majority of them, that drug is an SSRI. SSRI stands for selective  serotonin reuptake inhibitor. These drugs act by increasing brain levels  of serotonin. 
 Serotonin affects more than just our mood. It  also plays a role in how we react to stress and anxiety. More recently,  serotonin action in the brain has gained attention related to how we  perceive pain. Some SSRIs are prescribed to treat chronic (long-lasting)  pain. 
 SSRIs are generally safe drugs. Like all medicines, they  can produce side effects in some people. Nausea, loose stools and  headaches are most common. They also can reduce sexual interest, desire,  performance, satisfaction or all four. 
 One of the more  worrisome side effects of SSRIs is an increased risk of bleeding. The  drugs affect serotonin levels in platelets as well as in the brain.  Platelets are the sticky cell fragments that play a crucial role in  blood clotting. 
 Doctors routinely consider bleeding risk when  people are scheduled for major surgery. The goal of this study was to  find out if SSRI use around the time of surgery might cause more  unwanted bleeding. The researchers also looked at the number of SSRI  users having major surgery who died in the hospital or were admitted  again within 30 days. 
 These outcomes of surgery were worse in  SSRI users. However, this type of study can only show a link between  outcomes and SSRI use. It does not prove that taking an SSRI before or  right after surgery was the reason for excess bleeding or directly  increased risk of death. People who take an SSRI are more likely to have  other medical problems than non-users. 
 <strong>What Changes Can I Make Now?</strong>
 If you do need major surgery and take an SSRI, talk with your doctor about the best approach for you. 
  Even if there is a risk of excess bleeding from an SSRI, that extra  risk is extremely small. However, if you also take a drug to prevent  blood clots, such as aspirin or warfarin (Coumadin), the bleeding risk  could be significant. 
 Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs  (NSAIDs) on their own can cause internal bleeding. These types of drugs  include ibuprofen, naproxen and many others. NSAIDs make platelets less  sticky and irritate the lining of the stomach and upper intestine. So,  if you combine an NSAID with an SSRI, the bleeding risk during and after  surgery likely increases even more. 
 In these circumstances,  your doctor will advise you about reducing doses and/or not taking some  of your medicines in the weeks before surgery. 
 You should not  stop taking an SSRI without getting advice from your doctor first. If  you take it for depression, your symptoms could return. And untreated  depression increases your risk of a poor outcome from surgery. Stopping  an SSRI also means you might have more pain after surgery. 
 Most importantly, suddenly stopping some SSRIs can cause &quot;SSRI discontinuation syndrome.&quot; Symptoms include: 
<ul><li>Dizziness</li><li>Nausea</li><li>Insomnia</li><li>Anxiety</li><li>Irritability</li><li>Aches and pains</li></ul>
  This problem occurs most often when people taking high doses of a  short-acting SSRI stop without slowly lowering the dose. Paroxetine  (Paxil) is an example. 
 <strong>What Can I Expect Looking to the Future?</strong>
  Based on this study and other evidence we have so far, no broad  guidelines regarding SSRIs and major surgery will be available any time  soon. As with all your medicines, you and your doctor will decide what  medicines to take and how to take them based on your own situation.]]></content:encoded>
			
			<pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 14:05:00 -0400</pubDate>
			
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Excess Weight, Drinking Boost Liver Damage</title>
			<link>http://www.planforyourhealth.com/living-healthy/health-news/healthy-living/healthy-living-details/newsarticle/excess-weight-drinking-boost-liver-damage/</link>
			<description> Overweight women who drink too much alcohol greatly increase their  risk of liver damage, a new...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Overweight women who drink too much alcohol greatly increase their  risk of liver damage, a new study finds. The study included more than  107,000 women. Researchers divided them into groups based on weight and  how much alcohol they drank. Overweight women who drank heavily had  three times the risk of chronic liver disease (cirrhosis) and death as  light drinkers of normal weight. Heavy drinking was defined as more than  15 units of alcohol per week. One unit is equal to 25 milliliters (ml)  of whisky (about 1 ounce) or half of a 175 ml glass of wine. A second  study also found a higher risk of liver cancer for people who had fatty  liver disease and were overweight, obese or had type 2 diabetes. Both  studies were presented at a conference. HealthDay News wrote about them  April 27.

<strong>What Is the Doctor's Reaction?</strong>
 Fatty liver disease has become extremely common. Some estimates suggest as many as 20% of Americans have too much liver fat. 
  Not that long ago, fatty liver was linked mainly with overuse of  alcohol. Now the main reasons for fatty liver are the epidemics of  obesity and type 2 diabetes. Fatty liver affects 70% to 90% of people  with those conditions. It's not surprising that, as obesity and diabetes  have become more common, so has fatty liver disease. 
 Fatty  liver disease occurs when abnormal amounts of fat make their way into  liver cells. Having those fattened cells can lead to inflammation in the  liver. The inflammation damages surrounding liver tissue. 
 If  alcohol is the culprit, doctors call it alcoholic hepatitis. If excess  alcohol is not involved, it's called nonalcoholic steatohepatitis.  &quot;Steato&quot; refers to fat. &quot;Hepatitis&quot; means that the liver is inflamed. 
  The short name for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis is NASH. About 5% to  10% of people with fatty liver disease go on to develop NASH. 
  Alcoholic hepatitis can get better if people stop drinking soon enough.  NASH is often a relatively stable, low-grade condition. People generally  have no symptoms. But the fat build-up from either problem can start a  cascade of serious damage to the liver. This can lead to cirrhosis and  liver cancer. 
 These two studies confirm what experts have  expected for some time. People who drink too much alcohol and have  obesity or type 2 diabetes have a much higher risk of developing liver  failure from cirrhosis and liver cancer. 
 <strong>What Changes Can I Make Now?</strong>
  The best ways to help avoid and treat fatty liver are similar to the  recommendations that keep your heart healthy and prevent type 2  diabetes: 
<ul><li>Maintain a healthy weight and lose weight if necessary. </li><li>Stay  as physically active as possible all day long. If you have a desk job,  consider setting up your work station to stand most of the time. </li><li>Schedule dedicated exercise time of at least 30 minutes per day. </li></ul>
  In people who already have nonalcoholic fatty liver, weight loss seems  to have a very direct effect. As people lose weight, the fatty liver  becomes less fatty. Crash dieting is a bad idea. Rapid weight loss (four  pounds a week or more) can wind up damaging the liver. 
 Ideally,  anyone who has fatty liver should avoid alcohol. Based on these  studies, having more than one drink per day for women or two per day for  men adds to the risk of liver failure and liver cancer. However, it's  not as clear whether an occasional drink (no more than one per day, on  average) increases the risk. 
 <strong>What Can I Expect Looking to the Future?</strong>
  Alcohol and liver problems are well known. But liver damage related to  excess weight or diabetes has received less attention. The heart has  been the greater worry for people with these problems. And a little  alcohol is said to be good for the heart. 
 Perhaps we need to acknowledge that even a little alcohol might not be best for people at risk of fatty liver.]]></content:encoded>
			
			<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 13:33:00 -0400</pubDate>
			
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Survey: Most Don't Plan for Long-Term Care</title>
			<link>http://www.planforyourhealth.com/living-healthy/health-news/healthy-living/healthy-living-details/newsarticle/survey-most-dont-plan-for-long-term-care/</link>
			<description> About 2 out of 3 Americans over age 40 have done little or no  planning for long-term care, a new...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[ About 2 out of 3 Americans over age 40 have done little or no  planning for long-term care, a new survey finds. Only one-quarter even  believe they'll need help, although about half have cared for an older  friend or relative themselves. The AP-NORC Center for Public Affairs  Research did the survey. Most people polled said family or friends would  help them if needed. But 6 out of 10 have not talked with them about  it. About 7 out of 10 U.S. adults need some sort of long-term care after  age 65. This may be given by a relative or in assisted living or a  nursing home. On average, the care lasts about 3 years. More than  one-third of those surveyed said, mistakenly, that Medicare pays for  nursing home care. Medicare pays only for a short time, after a hospital  stay. Medicaid, the government health insurance for the poor, pays for  most long-term care in the United States. But people must &quot;spend down&quot;  most of their assets before they qualify. Nursing homes cost an average  of $6,700 a month. Most of those surveyed gave much lower estimates. The  Associated Press wrote about the survey April 24.

<strong>What Is the Doctor's Reaction?</strong>
 <em>When I am an old woman, I shall wear purple.</em>
  I have always loved the poem by Jenny Joseph that starts with those  words. I love that the woman in this poem is unafraid to grow old, and I  love her plans: 
<em>I shall … go out in my slippers in the rain, <br /> And pick the flowers in other people’s gardens, <br /> And learn to spit.</em>
 Despite being so full of plans, nowhere does she anticipate how she might pay for long-term care. 
  A survey released this week found that two-thirds of Americans over age  40 have done &quot;little or no planning&quot; for how they might pay for  long-term care as an older adult. 
 As a primary care doctor, I  see my patients struggle with the major impact of age-related care needs  on their lives and their financial realities. Long-term care costs are  huge. Really, we can't afford not to think about it. 
 The U.S.  Census Bureau estimates that $217 billion will be spent in 2015 on  nursing home and residential care. This includes assisted living  facilities and board and care homes. Currently, about 25% of these costs  are paid out-of-pocket by older adults and their families. Almost  two-thirds of the cost is paid by Medicaid and Medicare combined. 
  Medicare pays for only a short term when illness causes disability --  20 days in a nursing home. After that, patients must meet these costs  out-of-pocket. Most older adults with chronic needs then &quot;spend down&quot;  their funds to pay for long-term care until the money runs out. At that  point, at poverty level, Medicaid support may be available. 
 The  vast majority of older adults live in their own home or apartment, or  with family. This includes more than 3 out of 4 people ages 85 and  older. But most people will need help, at least for a short time, as  they age. They may need help with personal care, such as bathing and  dressing, or more intense support in a nursing home. 
 <strong>What Changes Can I Make Now?</strong>
  There is no perfect way to plan for long-term care, in the event you  will need it. But you can begin to make a plan, even if it's not  perfect. 
 <strong>1. Talk with your family. </strong> Nearly 60% of elderly  people who need help with personal care rely fully on unpaid  caregivers, usually their children or spouses. Sometimes this is an  obvious arrangement. But your family must be flexible and committed. If a  caregiver must stay at home, some family income will be lost. This is  rarely a comfortable situation if everyone did not agree ahead of time. 
 <strong>2. Consider long-term-care insurance. </strong>  Fewer than 3% of American adults have purchased a long-term care  insurance policy. The average cost is high. A typical plan might cost  $3,300 a year for a healthy 60-year-old husband and wife. And it might  pay only a $150 a day for up to 3 years. For a person who buys this  insurance at age 65, there is a 45% chance of making a claim. If you  never need long-term care, the payments you made to the plan are lost. 
 <strong>3. An &quot;age in place&quot; retirement arrangement might be right for you. </strong>  Some campus-like retirement communities are designed to permit an older  adult to &quot;age in place.&quot; This means you can go from a relatively  independent life to a more dependent life while staying in the same  community. Services often include recreation for the active elderly and  24-hour skilled nursing or rehabilitation services for the frail  elderly. These organizations are called continuing care retirement  communities. They are always expensive. Usually, they charge an up-front  fee of $25,000 to $500,000. Then you pay a membership fee or rent each  month. 
 <strong>4. Build up your savings. </strong> Making ends meet is a  challenge. But in your working years, don't underestimate how much you  need to save. &quot;After we no longer have our mortgage, we should be able  to live on that,&quot; we all think. But plan for some money to stay in your  savings. If disability strikes, you will need it. 
 <strong>5. Write an advance directive (&quot;living will&quot;).</strong>  Some people receive intensive medical care after they become profoundly  disabled. By then, they are no longer able to let their family and  doctor know what care they want. If you know that you would not want  life-sustaining treatments in this condition, it is wise to record your  wishes in a legal &quot;advance directive.&quot; 
 <strong>What Can I Expect Looking to the Future?</strong>
  By 2030, 20% of the U.S. population is predicted to be over the age of  65. It is not clear that Medicare and Medicaid will be able to sustain  the contributions that they make now toward long-term care. This is a  good reason for Americans to plan ahead. ]]></content:encoded>
			
			<pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 13:54:00 -0400</pubDate>
			
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Surgery Lag Harms Young with Breast Cancer</title>
			<link>http://www.planforyourhealth.com/living-healthy/health-news/healthy-living/healthy-living-details/newsarticle/surgery-lag-harms-young-with-breast-cancer/</link>
			<description> Young women with breast cancer don't live as long if they delay  treatment 6 weeks or more, a new...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Young women with breast cancer don't live as long if they delay  treatment 6 weeks or more, a new study finds. These delays occur about  twice as often for young women who are black, Hispanic, poor, on  Medicaid or uninsured. About 6% of breast cancers occur in young women.  These cancers are more likely to grow and spread quickly than breast  cancers in older women. Researchers looked at medical records for 8,860  women, ages 15 to 39. About 8% of white women and 15% of black and  Hispanic women received treatment at least 6 weeks after diagnosis.  About 80% of those who delayed treatment lived at least 5 years. That  compares with 90% survival for those treated within 2 weeks after  diagnosis. Fewer than 10% of women with private insurance had delayed  treatment, compared with 18% of those who had Medicaid or no insurance.  Survival after a treatment delay was particularly low, 57%, for young  black women. About 69% of poor women lived 5 years after delayed  treatment. Survival was 65% for those with Medicaid or no insurance. The  journal JAMA Surgery published the study. Reuters Health news service  wrote about it April 24.

<strong>What Is the Doctor's Reaction?</strong>
  It may surprise you to learn that up to 6% of breast cancers occur in  women between the ages of 15 and 39. That's about one in 17 cases. It  certainly surprised me. 
 Breast cancers diagnosed in these young  women tend to grow and spread faster than in older women. As a result,  they are more difficult to treat and survival rates may be lower. 
  Rapid diagnosis and early treatment are particularly important. A new  study shows just how important. Researchers analyzed more than 8,800  cases of breast cancers occurring in young women. They wanted to  understand the impact of rapid treatment or treatment delay. 
 For  these young women, a delay in surgery of more than 6 weeks after the  diagnosis was linked with a 5-year survival of 80%. Survival was 90% for  those treated sooner. 
 Treatment delay was nearly twice as  common among Hispanic and African-American women (15%) as among white  women (8%). Delays also occurred more often among women who were poor or  had public or no health insurance. 
 This new research emphasizes that: 
<ul><li>Although the condition is more common with advancing age, young women can and do develop breast cancer. </li><li>Prompt treatment can be life-saving. </li><li>Access to health care and good insurance coverage can have a big impact on the outcome of this condition. </li></ul>
 <strong>What Changes Can I Make Now?</strong>
 First, learn about the risk factors for breast cancer. Then, do what you can to reduce your risk. Risk factors include: 
<ul><li>Age -- Risk rises as women get older. </li><li>Gender --Risk is much higher in women than men. But men can develop breast cancer. </li><li>A personal or family history of breast cancer</li><li>A history of radiation to the chest, as in treatment for lymphoma or other types of cancer</li><li>Excessive exposure to estrogen -- This can be due to:<br /><ul><li>Menstruation starting before age 13</li><li>Menopause after age 51 </li><li>Use of estrogen replacement for more than 5 years</li></ul></li><li>No pregnancies </li><li>First pregnancy after age 30</li><li>Excess weight</li><li>Excessive alcohol consumption (3 or more drinks per day) </li><li>Lack of exercise </li></ul>
  Of course, some of these risk factors (such as age, gender and family  history) cannot be changed. For others, however, you can take steps to  reduce your risk of breast cancer (or its complications). 
<ul><li>Don't smoke. </li><li>Keep your weight in a healthy range. </li><li>Exercise regularly. </li><li>Drink only moderate amounts of alcohol. </li><li>Have  regular screenings, including breast examinations and mammograms. The  best time to start and how often to repeat these is uncertain. Discuss a  screening plan with your doctor. Bring your prior mammograms with you  or have all of your mammograms done at the same place. Then the  radiologists can compare current with past results. </li><li>Consider  genetic testing if you're at high risk. But before having a genetic  test, talk with your doctor about how this information could be useful. </li><li>Be  sure to see your doctor if you discover a lump. Fortunately, many lumps  will turn out to be harmless. But if a lump is cancerous, waiting could  reduce the success of treatment. </li></ul>
 This new research shows  that prompt treatment for newly diagnosed breast cancer is particularly  important for young women. Regardless of age, however, it makes little  sense to delay needed treatment. 
 <strong>What Can I Expect Looking to the Future?</strong>
  In the future, I think we will know more about the causes of breast  cancer and how to prevent it. For example, as more genes are linked with  breast cancer, genetic testing may become routine. In addition, as we  learn more about the genetic makeup of breast tumors, doctors may use  this information to guide treatment. 
 In the meantime, there  seems little doubt that early diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer  can make a big difference. This new study demonstrates this point among  younger women, who tend to have more aggressive disease. But it's likely  that the same is true for some other types of cancer. 
 Some  treatments can wait. But, for young women with breast cancer, the sooner  treatment begins, the better. This new research clearly shows why. ]]></content:encoded>
			
			<pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 14:21:00 -0400</pubDate>
			
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Beta-Blockers May Trim Deaths after Surgery</title>
			<link>http://www.planforyourhealth.com/living-healthy/health-news/conditions/health-conditions-details/newsarticle/beta-blockers-may-trim-deaths-after-surgery/</link>
			<description> Taking a common heart drug before surgery may reduce death rates for  some patients, a new study...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Taking a common heart drug before surgery may reduce death rates for  some patients, a new study suggests. Researchers looked at non-heart  surgeries involving almost 137,000 people. About 40% of the patients  took a type of drug called a beta-blocker before surgery and for 30 days  afterward. People with a high risk of heart or blood vessel problems  were more likely to take these drugs. They slow the heart rate and are  used to reduce blood pressure and treat heart rhythm problems. People  who took beta-blockers were less likely to die in the 30 days after  surgery than similar patients who did not take them. The drugs reduced  the risk of death and problems such as heart attack most for higher-risk  surgery patients. People with higher risk included those with prior  heart disease, stroke, heart failure, diabetes and kidney disease. The  Journal of the American Medical Association published the study.  HealthDay News wrote about it April 23. 

<strong>What Is the Doctor's Reaction?</strong>
  Protecting the heart has always been a big concern for anyone having  major surgery. But better techniques for surgery and anesthesia have  improved results. The risk of a heart attack and heart-related death has  greatly decreased during the last few decades. 
 Taking a  beta-blocker before and after major surgery may be another way to help  protect the heart. Examples of commonly prescribed beta-blockers include  atenolol, metoprolol and carvedilol. 
 Early studies suggested  that anyone at risk of heart trouble could benefit from taking a  beta-blocker before and after major surgery. These drugs slow the heart  rate and decrease the heart's work load. But results of later studies  were less clear for people having non-vascular surgery. Usually doctors  advise a beta-blocker for patients having vascular surgery. (Vascular  surgery is surgery on blood vessels. Examples include as fixing an  abdominal aortic aneurysm or a bypassing blockage in a leg artery). 
  Now doctors have a little more guidance from the results of a study  published today. The study focused on six factors to find out who is  most likely to benefit from taking a beta-blocker before major surgery  and at least 30 days afterward. The factors were: 
<ul><li>High-risk surgery, such as surgery on blood vessels or an operation that typically involves a lot of bleeding</li><li>History of stroke or narrow arteries in the neck that increase stroke risk</li><li>Known coronary artery disease</li><li>Heart failure</li><li>Diabetes</li><li>Kidney disease with decreased kidney function</li></ul>
  For people with two or more of these risk factors, taking a  beta-blocker before surgery and during the next month improved outcomes.  They had a significant decrease in their risk of heart attack, cardiac  arrest (heart stopping) and death during that time period. 
 The results of the study were published in the April 24 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association. 
 <strong>What Changes Can I Make Now?</strong>
  Are you scheduled for surgery? If you have even one of the risk factors  mentioned in the study, ask your doctor whether you should start a  beta-blocker. 
 Anyone over age 50 with multiple heart-disease  risk factors might also benefit from treatment with a beta-blocker  before surgery. It depends on how many risk factors you have and the  type of surgery. 
 As a reminder, those heart-disease risk factors include: 
<ul><li>Smoking or other regular tobacco use</li><li>Family history of coronary artery disease under age 60</li><li>High LDL cholesterol</li><li>High blood pressure</li></ul>
  Ideally, people who are not already taking a beta-blocker but need one  should start taking it at least one week before surgery. I prefer to  start it two or more weeks before surgery when possible. I start at a  low dose and increase the dose gradually. Beta-blockers slow the heart  rate. So this can guide the dosing. The heart-rate goal depends on the  individual patient. 
 <strong>What Can I Expect Looking to the Future?</strong>
  During the last few years, doctors have become less likely to prescribe  beta-blockers before surgery for people not already taking them. The  evidence was not conclusive. But this new study helps define which  patients are likely to get the most benefit. Beta-blocker therapy for  this purpose will almost surely increase.]]></content:encoded>
			
			<pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 14:32:00 -0400</pubDate>
			
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Some Alternatives May Cut Blood Pressure</title>
			<link>http://www.planforyourhealth.com/living-healthy/health-news/healthy-living/healthy-living-details/newsarticle/some-alternatives-may-cut-blood-pressure/</link>
			<description> Some alternative treatments may slightly lower blood pressure, a new  report says. But the only...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[ Some alternative treatments may slightly lower blood pressure, a new  report says. But the only non-drug treatment with strong, proven  benefit is aerobic exercise. Those are the conclusions of an American  Heart Association (AHA) review of research. It found that transcendental  meditation (TM), biofeedback and guided breathing may help some people.  But the effects on blood pressure were small. Other types of meditation  did not lower blood pressure. Neither did yoga or acupuncture. Aerobic  exercise had the strongest research support. It also lowered blood  pressure more than any treatment other than medicine. The AHA recommends  aerobic exercise for most people with pre-hypertension or high blood  pressure. Resistance exercise that involves movement also may lower  blood pressure, the report says. People should follow their doctors'  advice about whether to take medicine for blood pressure. Alternative  treatments can be a supplement, not a substitute. The journal  Hypertension published the report. HealthDay News wrote about it April  22.

<strong>What Is the Doctor's Reaction?</strong>
  Sixty million Americans know they have high blood pressure  (hypertension). But fewer than half have it under control. Why is that?  High blood pressure alone rarely causes symptoms. And taking pills for  something that doesn't make you feel bad can be hard to swallow. 
  So many people with high blood pressure seek alternative means to help  lower their blood pressure. Methods include relaxation exercises,  meditation, biofeedback, yoga and acupuncture. How much can any of these  lower your blood pressure readings? 
 A large group of  researchers has tried to answer that question. They did an exhaustive  review of studies that looked at alternative therapies. They also  included studies that looked at the impact of regular exercise on blood  pressure. 
 Many studies have looked at exercise and high blood  pressure. Of the different types of exercise, the researchers found that  regular aerobic exercise lowered blood pressure the most. And aerobic  exercise was better than any of the alternative therapies. 
  Interestingly, dynamic resistance training also helped lower blood  pressure. You can do dynamic resistance exercises with free weights or  resistance machines. Your muscles and joints are moving during these  exercises. On the other hand, isometric exercises do not appear to  improve blood pressure. These exercises put stress on your muscles  without any movement. Using a hand grip is one example. 
 The  authors found fewer well-done studies on alternative therapies. Their  analysis suggests that deep meditation, biofeedback and some relaxation  techniques lowered blood pressure a little. The few studies available on  yoga and acupuncture suggested no benefit. 
 <strong>What Changes Can I Make Now?</strong>
  Most importantly, get your blood pressure checked. Normal blood  pressure is a reading of no higher than 120/80. Readings between 120/80  and 139/89 show pre-hypertension. And high blood pressure is defined as  multiple readings of 140/90 and higher. 
 Lifestyle changes might  help prevent you from needing medicines. And even if you need to take  drugs to lower blood pressure, you likely will need fewer pills and  lower doses. 
 Regular aerobic exercise has been a standard  recommendation to help lower blood pressure. Your goal is to work up to  moderate-intensity exercise most days of the week. Ideally, strive for  45 to 60 minutes at each session. But even 20 to 30 minutes makes a  difference. 
 In addition: 
<ul><li>Maintain a healthy weight. </li><li>Eat more fruits, vegetables and whole grains. Choose low-fat dairy foods. </li><li>Eat less salt. </li><li>Include foods rich in potassium in your diet, unless you have kidney disease. </li><li>If you are a man who drinks alcohol, have no more than two drinks per day. Women should have no more than one drink per day. </li><li>Don't smoke. </li></ul>
 <strong>What Can I Expect Looking to the Future?</strong>
  Similar to most medical studies, this one looked at average benefits  for each alternative therapy. Many people did not see lower blood  pressures from one or more of these methods. But some did. So you might  find that stress reduction, meditation or some other technique works for  you. ]]></content:encoded>
			
			<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 14:23:00 -0400</pubDate>
			
		</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>